<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>SoCal Sports Observed</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.laobserved.com/sports/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.laobserved.com/sports/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.laobserved.com,2008:/sports//7</id>
    <link rel="service.post" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.laobserved.com/scgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=7" title="SoCal Sports Observed" />
    <updated>2008-07-09T02:40:12Z</updated>
    <subtitle>Sports news, commentary and insight from LA Observed contributors</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 3.2</generator>
 
<entry>
    <title>Brand Leaves Clippers for Philadelphia</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.laobserved.com/sports/2008/07/brand_leaves_clippers_for_phil.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.laobserved.com/scgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=7/entry_id=14511" title="Brand Leaves Clippers for Philadelphia" />
    <id>tag:www.laobserved.com,2008:/sports//7.14511</id>
    
    <published>2008-07-09T02:08:34Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-09T02:40:12Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Elton Brand screws over the Clippers and becomes a Sixer. </summary>
    <author>
        <name>Phil Wallace</name>
        <uri>http://www.laobserved.com/contributors.php#wallace</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Los Angeles" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.laobserved.com/sports/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Well, so much for that. Just days ago Clipper Nation going ga-ga over the potential pairing of Baron Davis and Elton Brand. Now those hopes and dreams have been shattered, as the LA Times reports that Brand <a href="http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-clippers9-2008jul09,0,7626268.story">has signed a 5-year $80 million contract with the Philadelphia 76ers</a>. </p>

<p>The move is rather shocking for several reasons. When Davis agreed to terms with the Clippers, a mere 24 hours after the NBA free agent period began, many observers assumed that the move had been prearranged between Brand and Davis. When Brand opted out of his contract, he indicated that it was done partially for the Clippers to obtain extra salary cap room and sign a big-name free agent... like a Baron Davis. He explicitly said that it was his intent to remain a Clipper. And while most players who have been in a Clipper uniform for any extended period of time seem desperate to take the first plane out of town, Brand had established firm roots in Los Angeles, having set up a production company and produced the movie Rescue Dawn. </p>

<p>While the Sixers will have one of the better Eastern Conference teams now with Brand, Andre Iguodala, Andre Miller, and Samuel Dalembert, it's hard to argue that a Clipper team with Brand, Davis, Eric Gordon, and Chris Kaman wouldn't have been better. Now, Elton Brand, who has always had a squeaky clean image, will branded in this town as a traitor. </p>

<p>As for the Clippers, one can't help but feel for them. The organization finally seemed to be doing everything right, bringing in one star player to complement another, and spending big money to do so. They offered Brand as much as they could have, and it's not clear that it was much less than what Philadelphia offered. Now they theoretically have plenty of cap room to go after some big free agents. But many of the top names have already made their decisions, including Corey Maggette who <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=3479117">reached terms with the Golden State Warriors</a>. </p>

<p>The Clippers are rumored to be interested in signing Josh Smith from Atlanta, a budding superstar who has shown immaturity, but Smith is a restricted free agent, meaning the Hawks can match any offer. They could also make a run at a restricted free agent like Luol Deng of the Chicago Bulls. Or they could wait to use that cap space on a big free agent next year. </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Dodgers in First Place</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.laobserved.com/sports/2008/07/dodgers_in_first_place.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.laobserved.com/scgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=7/entry_id=14490" title="Dodgers in First Place" />
    <id>tag:www.laobserved.com,2008:/sports//7.14490</id>
    
    <published>2008-07-08T14:39:04Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-08T17:02:20Z</updated>
    
    <summary>A near perfect game for Hiroki Kuroda has the Dodgers tied with Arizona for the NL West lead, despite having a losing record. </summary>
    <author>
        <name>Phil Wallace</name>
        <uri>http://www.laobserved.com/contributors.php#wallace</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Los Angeles" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.laobserved.com/sports/">
        <![CDATA[<p>It may not be how they planned it. But after Hiroki Kuroda's <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/recap?gameId=280707119">near-perfect 1-hit gem</a> last night, the Dodgers are tied for first place in the NL West with a 44-45 record. </p>

<p>While it's easy to be cynical about the Dodgers current standing, it's hard to deny that they have been playing visibly better baseball of late. The Dodgers are 8-3 in their last 11 games, and <a href="http://www.latimes.com/sports/baseball/mlb/dodgers/la-sp-dodgers7-2008jul07,0,3467859.story">appear to have bought into Joe Torre's system</a>. Torre's New York teams always seemed to get better as the season wore on, and it's possible that we'll see the same with the Dodgers. One of Torre's strengths is his ability to manage a clubhouse for a full 162 game schedule, and keep a team mentally strong through the ebbs and flows of a long season. The Dodgers may still be in a transition period, but it's nice to see Torre's influence begin to rub off on this bunch. </p>

<p>In the meantime, some Dodger fans are upset that the team couldn't pull off of a deal for CC Sabathia, who wound up with the Brewers. While Sabathia would have been a fantastic addition, as Bill Shaikin <a href="http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-bbcol8-2008jul08,0,7249076.story">points out in the LA Times today</a>, the Dodgers didn't really match up well for a trade with the Indians. </p>

<p>Some have bemoaned that the Dodgers are trying to win with "kids," but in reality, the best way to win in baseball these days is by building a solid foundation through a strong farm system. While it can be extremely frustrating to watch some of their young players go through growing pains, it's the right way to go. The Dodgers are on their fifth general manager this decade and have been inconsistent in recent years because they haven't had the leadership in place long enough to be patient with a plan. </p>

<p>A few days ago, Bill Plaschke in the LA Times said the Dodger young players <a href="http://www.latimes.com/sports/baseball/mlb/dodgers/la-sp-plaschke4-2008jul04,0,358919.column">have been "coddled."</a> I'm not in the Dodger clubhouse, so I don't know what is really happening. But as Jon Weisman <a href="http://dodgerthoughts.baseballtoaster.com/archives/1042299.html">points out in Dodger Thoughts</a>, that seems a bit far-fetched. Weisman notes that most of the Dodger young players have been sent down, benched, and/or criticized in the media. Yet I would argue that Matt Kemp, Andre Ethier, Russell Martin, James Loney, Blake DeWitt, Chad Billingsley, and Jonathan Broxton have all earned their places in Dodger lineup. Also, from my perception, Ned Colletti and Joe Torre don't seem like the type of people who would coddle anyone. </p>

<p>I do think the young Dodgers could benefit from some veteran leadership though. The Tampa Bay Rays (which I have close connections to) are having an excellent season thus far and have benefited from the additions of Troy Percival and Cliff Floyd. Both players have been fantastic veteran leaders on one of baseball's youngest teams, and they have played an instrumental role in leading the Rays to the best record in baseball to this point. Down in Orange County, I think the Angels have really been helped by the leadership that Torii Hunter provides. </p>

<p>While it's possible the Dodger veterans are providing this leadership, I don't recall having read too many articles or quotes praising them in this role. I have read quotes from Jeff Kent criticizing his younger teammates though. It's also worth noting that many of the Dodger veterans have been injured this season, and there have been large chunks of this season when the Dodgers have had a higher payroll on the DL than on the field. It is somewhat difficult for a player to lead when he's at the training table or on a rehab assignment</p>

<p>If the Dodgers can continue to get healthy, and if they can continue to learn from Joe Torre, then I do like their chances to improve in the second half. They are fortunate to be tied for first place considering all of their struggles this season. But it does seem like they're getting better at the right time. </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Clippers sign Baron Davis</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.laobserved.com/sports/2008/07/clippers_sign_baron_davis.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.laobserved.com/scgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=7/entry_id=14431" title="Clippers sign Baron Davis" />
    <id>tag:www.laobserved.com,2008:/sports//7.14431</id>
    
    <published>2008-07-02T05:51:41Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-02T08:53:14Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The LA native is the biggest signing in team history and he creates a legit Laker-Clipper rivalry. </summary>
    <author>
        <name>Phil Wallace</name>
        <uri>http://www.laobserved.com/contributors.php#wallace</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Los Angeles" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.laobserved.com/sports/">
        <![CDATA[<p>In what will be the biggest free agent signing in Los Angeles Clipper history, the team <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=3470016">has reached a verbal agreement with Baron Davis</a> on a 5-year $65 million contract. Later today, the LA Times reported that the Clippers are now <a href="http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-clippers2-2008jul02,0,2121230.story">expected to re-sign Elton Brand</a>.</p>

<p>The two moves make the Clippers a very relevant team in the NBA. For the first time, they have legitimate superstar player who can move the needle here in Los Angeles. Davis is an LA native, and I absolutely love his game. Stealing him from the Golden State Warriors is a coup. He brings playmaking ability that the Clippers have never had, he's a terrific complement to Brand, and he allows the Clippers to bring Eric Gordon along slowly. </p>

<p>Still, while Davis is a great player, he has a history of injuries, and he doesn't necessarily guarantee the Clippers a playoff berth in a conference where Portalnd is much improved, Denver, Utah, Houston, Phoenix, San Antonio, New Orleans, and Dallas are pretty darned good too, and the Lakers are still LA's team. But this move is a major shot in the arm for a franchise that sorely needed one. The Clippers are now certainly in the mix with the other good Western Conference teams, and it's hard for them to ask for a whole lot more. </p>

<p>Over the years, people have criticized Donald Sterling for refusing to spend money on players in an effort to pocket profits. But that criticism hasn't been accurate recently. Sterling is now paying large contracts to Chris Kaman, Cuttino Mobley, Tim Thomas, and now Brand and Davis. He was also paying a large contract to Corey Maggette. Now all of those contracts aren't necessarily great, but it's awfully hard to say Sterling is cheap these days. Give him credit for spending money and trying to improve the product on the court. </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Laker, Clipper free agent updates</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.laobserved.com/sports/2008/07/laker_clipper_free_agent_updat.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.laobserved.com/scgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=7/entry_id=14423" title="Laker, Clipper free agent updates" />
    <id>tag:www.laobserved.com,2008:/sports//7.14423</id>
    
    <published>2008-07-01T22:31:01Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-02T08:53:33Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The Lakers look to re-sign Sasha Vujacic and Ronny Turiaf, while the Clippers are making a push for Baron Davis. </summary>
    <author>
        <name>Phil Wallace</name>
        <uri>http://www.laobserved.com/contributors.php#wallace</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Los Angeles" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.laobserved.com/sports/">
        <![CDATA[<p>--The Lakers have made it clear that they want to keep as much of their team together as possible. Last night, the team formally <a href="http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-lakers1-2008jul01,0,5635934.story">extended offers to both Sasha Vujacic and Ronny Turiaf</a>, making them restricted free agents. If either player signs an offer sheet with another team, then it seems as if the Lakers are set on matching, so long as the contract is not outrageous. </p>

<p>As for the rest of the team, we still haven't heard any substantial trade rumors about Lamar Odom. It appears Mitch Kupchak believes that coming back with the same team plus a healthy Andrew Bynum should be enough to push the Lakers ahead one extra step. That's not a bad philosophy, but given Odom's frustrating play in the Finals and that he has just one year left on his contract, they will at least have to consider trade options. Two weeks ago, we mentioned Richard Jefferson as a possibility, but he's already been dealt to Milwaukee.</p>

<p><br />
--As for the Clippers, both Elton Brand and Corey Maggette <a href="http://www.latimes.com/sports/basketball/nba/clippers/la-sp-clippers1-2008jul01,0,1092404.story">opted out of their contracts</a>. Maggette's move was expected, and Brand was only a mild surprise. Brand has said publicly that he is still intent on staying on as a Clipper and working out a long-term contract. Still, both Memphis and Philadelphia have cap room and could potentially sign him. Also, it's well-known that Pat Riley has salivated over Brand for years, and he'd love to work out a sign-and-trade for Brand to come to the Heat. The Clippers would probably have to settle for Shawn Marion if they were stuck in that situation. </p>

<p>Maggette has also said that he'd like to stay, but hasn't seemed quite as bullish about it. While he's reportedly a favorite of owner Donald Sterling, he has butted heads with head coach Mike Dunleavy. It's more likely that Maggette leaves the Clippers, possibly through a sign-and-trade that could net LA a high quality player in return, or an expiring contract. </p>

<p>The big news today in Clipperland though is their <a href="http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-clippers2-2008jul02,0,2121230.story">sudden pursuit of Baron Davis</a>, who surprisingly opted out of his deal with the Golden State Warriors last night. Davis is an LA native who went to Crossroads for high school and then played at UCLA. They can afford him under the cap if they renounce their free agent rights to Maggette. And if they can re-sign Brand, bring in Davis, and pair the duo with Eric Gordon, then the Clippers are a very interesting basketball team. </p>

<p>Meanwhile Davis said he <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=3468448">preferred to remain a Warrior</a>, while not ruling out the Clippers. In an e-mail sent to ESPN.com's J.A. Adande, Davis wrote: "Clipps r possible. G State is where I wanna b."</p>

<p>The Clippers are also pursuing Beno Udrih, although it's not completely certain how he fits into this mix now that Davis is on their radar. Another possibility is Gilbert Arenas, an LA native who went to Grant High School in Van Nuys. Getting him in Clipper red and blue would be an absolute coup. However, Arenas has spurned the Clippers in the past and right now the smart money is on him choosing to stay in Washington. </p>

<p>Still, either Arenas or Davis would give the Clippers enough star power to be relevant on the crowded LA sports scene, and either paired with Brand should be enough to get them into the playoffs in a competitive Western Conference. </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>NBA draft report</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.laobserved.com/sports/2008/06/nba_draft_report.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.laobserved.com/scgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=7/entry_id=14379" title="NBA draft report" />
    <id>tag:www.laobserved.com,2008:/sports//7.14379</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-27T05:19:02Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-02T08:53:46Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The Clippers take Eric Gordon from Indiana, while the Lakers wind up with Kentucky&apos;s Joe Crawford. </summary>
    <author>
        <name>Phil Wallace</name>
        <uri>http://www.laobserved.com/contributors.php#wallace</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Los Angeles" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.laobserved.com/sports/">
        <![CDATA[<p>**There will be full analysis of the NBA Draft on my KSCR Radio show this Saturday from Noon to 2 PM, on KSCR.org and 1560 AM. </p>

<p>--The Clippers <a href="http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080626/SPORTS0601/80626073">selected Eric Gordon</a> in the first round today with the No. 7 pick overall. The 6-3 guard averaged more than 20 points a game for Indiana this season, and displayed all-world talent at times. But I can't help to wonder if the Clippers should have taken Arizona's Jerryd Bayless with the pick, who I think Portland got in a steal. </p>

<p>Both players are extremely talented, both are tremendous scorers, and there are questions about both players' ability to play the point guard position. But both players also dealt with unusual coaching situations in college, and Bayless handled his well while Gordon seemed to go into a funk. Gordon may have a bit more upside than Bayless, but Bayless is a gym rat, a mentally strong player, and he's someone who can make players around him better. </p>

<p>If Kelvin Sampson hadn't left Indiana midseason, and if Gordon's wrist hadn't acted up, then it's possible that Gordon could have been drafted No. 3 overall. So from that perspective, the Clippers might have gotten great value. But the Clippers have a long history of taking high-potential picks, and many have proven to be busts. Gordon is better than most of those guys, but if I were Elgin Baylor, I would have taken a hard-working gym rat in Jarryd Bayless. </p>

<p><br />
--The Clippers also picked potential in the second round, going with DeAndre Jordan from Texas A&M. At 6-11 250 pounds, Jordan has a world of upside. Not long ago, people thought Jordan could be a top-10 pick. But Jordan fell into coach Mike Turgeon's doghouse and wasn't even starting by the end of the season. I've heard reports that he wasn't a hard enough worker, and that his lack of desire was on display in the draft workouts. Still, given Jordan's talent, it's probably worthwhile to take a chance on him in the second round. </p>

<p><br />
--The Clippers also traded for NBA D-League prospect Mike Taylor, who might bring them some athleticism off the bench. </p>

<p><br />
--As for the Lakers, they selected Kentucky guard Joe Crawford with the No. 58 overall pick.  I'm not even sure if he can make the team. He's a gritty player, and he reportedly worked out well in the Orlando pre-draft camp, but he just may not have the talent to play in the NBA. I was kind of hoping Lakers would take Davon Jefferson out of USC, who could add some size to their lineup, but I guess Mitch Kupchak wasn't enamored with him. </p>

<p><br />
--Looking at the local players drafted, a USC player went No. 3, while UCLA had players go No. 4 and No. 5. OJ Mayo is the highest Trojan ever selected in the NBA Draft. I'm not sure if he's exactly what the Minnesota Timberwolves are looking for, and I still wonder if he'll go somewhere in a trade. But if he stays in Minnesota, then they got themselves a guard who can score and defend extremely well. I still have questions though about Mayo's passing skills if they want him to play point guard. And I also wonder how well Mayo can really drive to the post. But a lot of scouts love him and think he can be a premier NBA player. I read one article comparing Mayo to Gilbert Arenas, which seems like awfully high praise. </p>

<p>I don't think UCLA's Russell Westbrook was the fourth-best player in the draft, but the Sonics got themselves an excellent player. Westbrook is not going to dominate NBA games, but he's the kind of athletic do-everything guard who will help a team win. He can defend, rebound, pass, and dive for the loose ball. Westbrook is a player who will do all of the little things well, and I think every championship team needs someone like him. </p>

<p>A number of people I've spoken with are down on Kevin Love, who went No. 5 overall to Memphis. But I think he can be a very good player in the NBA. Love dropped 15 pounds in the offseason, and I believe he's more athletic than people think. Memphis runs a Phoenix Suns style system, and I see him fitting in well, grabbing rebounds and then throwing precision outlet passes to Rudy Gay, Hakim Warrick, and Mike Miller if they keep him. He can shoot from the outside, play down low, and I think he plays bigger than whatever height skeptics think he is. </p>

<p>I'm surprised that Luc Richard Mbah a Moute went as high as he did, to Milwaukee at No. 37 overall. I might be wrong, but I don't see him lasting in the NBA for long. He's too injury prone, and I don't think he's tough enough to play at the next level. If he had chosen to stay in college, then would have had a more impressive senior season with Kevin Love gone, and he might have been taken in the first round. Now he'll have to rapidly improve. </p>

<p>It's disappointing that Davon Jefferson didn't get drafted at all. It makes you wonder why he bothered to come out to the NBA Draft instead of continuing to develop his game at USC. But Jefferson has never been known for his academics, and I guess he just didn't want to be a student any longer. Now he's got to re-evaluate his life because USC is out of the picture. <br />
<strong><br />
***UPDATE***</strong> OJ Mayo and Kevin Love came to LA together, and now they've been traded for one another. The Minnesota Timberwolves and the Memphis Grizzlies just completed a <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft2008/news/story?id=3463045">blockbuster 8-player deal</a> with Mayo and Love being the principle pieces. Honestly, I don't quite understand the deal for either team, but maybe it will play itself out over the next few days. </p>

<p>Love now gets to play for Kevin McHale, who he's a big fan of, and he goes alongside Al Jefferson. They both basically play the same position, but I guess they'll find a way to work in Love at center with Jefferson taking on his more natural position at the 4. That seems a bit awkward, but that might be the best way to make it work. As for Memphis, they have a glut of guards, and I'm not sure if the Suns-style system is best for Mayo. They won't be able to leverage his defensive abilities, but I guess he will add some athleticism to the squad. Regardless, it's an interesting chapter in the Mayo-Love story, which came through LA for all of one year. </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Clipper time</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.laobserved.com/sports/2008/06/clipper_time.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.laobserved.com/scgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=7/entry_id=14345" title="Clipper time" />
    <id>tag:www.laobserved.com,2008:/sports//7.14345</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-25T07:41:25Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-02T08:53:59Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Possibilities are abundant for the Clippers as the NBA Draft nears. </summary>
    <author>
        <name>Phil Wallace</name>
        <uri>http://www.laobserved.com/contributors.php#wallace</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Los Angeles" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.laobserved.com/sports/">
        <![CDATA[<p>We've been so busy covering the Lakers for the past few weeks that it's easy to forget about the Clippers. Well, the NBA Draft is this Thursday, meaning it's the one week every year when the Clippers are the more intriguing LA-area basketball team (Shaq-Kobe feud not withstanding). </p>

<p>The Clippers currently hold the seventh pick, and the word out of Clipperland is that the Red and Blue are dead-set on taking a guard. Considering Shaun Livingston's injury and Sam Cassell's departure, this is understandable. At No. 7 overall, there's <a href="http://www.nbadraft.net/mocks/2008_nba_mock_draft.html">a decent chance the Clippers could wind up with Eric Gordon</a> out of Indiana, who is a terrific talent, but has shown immaturity at times... especially after his coach Kelvin Sampson left. Some mock drafts have shown UCLA's Russell Westbrook falling to the Clippers, but not everyone is convinced that he's a real point guard. </p>

<p>The Clippers are said to covet USC's OJ Mayo and have been rumored to be talking trade with Minnesota to move up to No. 3. Now there are rumors that the <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft2008/news/story?id=3459696">Miami Heat may be looking to trade out of the No. 2 spot</a>, which would theoretically put Kansas State's Michael Beasley on the table (not a guard, but an outstanding player), or LA could use that pick on Mayo. The Clippers would also probably be thrilled with drafting Arizona's Jerryd Bayless somewhere. </p>

<p>Trading up might require the Clippers to give Elton Brand to Miami, where Brand once signed an offer sheet to play. ESPN's Chad Ford reports that the Clippers could also wind up with Shawn Marion in such a deal. Ford also reports that the Clippers <a href="http://hoopshype.com/rumors.htm">are talking to Phoenix</a> about trading Corey Maggette and the No. 7 pick for Leandro Barbosa and the No. 15 pick. I don't understand that deal at all from the Clippers standpoint. There is such an enormous dropoff in talent in this draft after the first 10 or 11 players. </p>

<p>The Clippers are entering this off-season with plenty of uncertainty. Both Elton Brand and Corey Maggette have one-year player options worth $16.4 million and $8.4 million respectively. The Clippers say they want to keep both, but neither player has said what he'll do. If both guys opt out, then expect the Clippers to be the worst team in the NBA next season. My guess is that Brand will stay though and continue with his <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1580954/">movie producing career</a>. I can't imagine Maggette staying, considering his occasional feuding with Mike Dunleavy and the potential lucrative long-term contract he could sign with another team. </p>

<p>Either way, the historically frugal Clippers will pay several hefty salaries in 2008-09 to Chris Kaman ($10 million), Cuttino Mobley ($9 million), and Tim Thomas ($6 million). </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Shaq disses Kobe with rap</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.laobserved.com/sports/2008/06/shaq_disses_kobe_with_rap.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.laobserved.com/scgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=7/entry_id=14316" title="Shaq disses Kobe with rap" />
    <id>tag:www.laobserved.com,2008:/sports//7.14316</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-24T00:51:32Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-02T08:54:15Z</updated>
    
    <summary>A new rap video fuels the Shaq-Kobe rivalry. </summary>
    <author>
        <name>Phil Wallace</name>
        <uri>http://www.laobserved.com/contributors.php#wallace</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Los Angeles" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.laobserved.com/sports/">
        <![CDATA[<p>While Shaq was busy sitting on the couch, watching the NBA Finals after his Suns had been blown out of the first round by the Spurs, it turns out he was coming up with rap lyrics. Shaquille O'Neal's video of him <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=3457917">dissing Kobe Bryant</a>, while rapping on stage is making its way around the internet (<a href="http://www.tmz.com/tmz_main_video?titleid=1626146951">TMZ</a>). </p>

<p>Are we still fighting over this? Isn't it time that Shaq get over it? While Kobe deserves an enormous share of the blame for his public breakup with Shaq that caused the Lakers to enter a difficult 3-year rebuilding period, it's not as if Shaq is completely innocent either. Shaq helped facilitate the breakup by refusing to sign a contract that would have allowed the Lakers add any meaningful free agents, but the he wound up signing the same deal with the Heat that the Lakers wanted him to all along. His refusal to stay in shape and condition himself on a consistent basis probably cost the Lakers even more titles. </p>

<p>It's true that Kobe hasn't won without Shaq, but Shaq needed Kobe for his 3 Laker titles and he needed 2006 NBA Finals MVP Dwayne Wade to win his fourth in Miami. But unlike Shaq, Kobe still has a few good years ahead of him.</p>

<p>It's interesting to note that since the Shaq-Kobe breakup four years ago, Kobe has continued to take the high road. He hasn't lashed back at Shaq, nor insulted him on any number of things. Yet, Shaq continues to act petulant and bitter, even though he as a title ring, and for whatever reason, he can't move on. He still calls Kobe Bryant "you-know-who" and he refers to Phil Jackson as "Benedict Arnold." Now he comes out with these absurd rap lyrics, after losing in five games to a Spurs team that the Lakers beat in the playoffs, and after being traded from a Heat team that was embarrassingly bad with him in the starting lineup. Well, I think Laker fans will thank Shaq for helping to motivate Kobe next year. </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Wait until next year</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.laobserved.com/sports/2008/06/wait_until_next_year.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.laobserved.com/scgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=7/entry_id=14259" title="Wait until next year" />
    <id>tag:www.laobserved.com,2008:/sports//7.14259</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-18T05:24:50Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-19T05:30:16Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The Lakers get blown out of the NBA Finals. Now it&apos;s time to look at next year. </summary>
    <author>
        <name>Phil Wallace</name>
        <uri>http://www.laobserved.com/contributors.php#wallace</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Los Angeles" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.laobserved.com/sports/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The NBA Finals are over as the Lakers were <a href="http://scores.espn.go.com/nba/boxscore?gameId=280617002">humiliated in Game 6, losing 131-92</a>. There's really not a whole lot to say about this game that hasn't been said throughout the series. The Celtics proved that they are a better team. Their team defense was absolutely incredible, and they displayed a physical toughness that the Lakers were unable to match. Basketball is a game of matchups, and the Celtics certainly match up better against the Lakers. But the Celtics also displayed more heart and desire throughout the series. </p>

<p>Now that the season is over, it's time for the Lakers to examine several issues heading into next season:</p>

<p>--The biggest question facing the Lakers in 2008-09 is about Lamar Odom. There are times when Odom looks like a superstar, and during this season he thrived as a third option after Kobe Bryant and Pau Gasol. But Odom was a disappointment in the playoffs, reclaiming his status as the most enigmatic and inconsistent Laker. I'm no longer convinced that Odom can play the small forward position after watching him fail miserably at defending Paul Pierce. </p>

<p>Odom has one year left on his contract at $14.5 million. He turns 29 next season and has some basketball left in him. He's always been an East Coast guy though and there's no guarantee that Odom will re-sign with the Lakers when he becomes a free agent. It may make sense to trade Odom now for someone who's a better fit in the Lakers starting five. His expiring contract may be appealing to some teams that are looking for future cap. </p>

<p>I have no inside information on trade possibilities, but there are some scenarios out there which might make sense. The Bulls might be looking to trade Kirk Hinrich if they draft Derrick Rose, and Odom might work well in Chicago's system. Hinrich could be the Lakers defensive answer to quick Western Conference point guards like Chris Paul and Deron Williams, as Derek Fisher ages. Jordan Farmar certainly didn't make anyone hopeful about his future at point guard with his play later in the playoffs. Other trade possibilities might include Richard Jefferson of the Nets and Shawn Marion of the Heat. </p>

<p>--Vladimir Radmanovic is another problem. He's making over $6 million a year for the next three seasons, but he's been a disappointment since signing with the Lakers last year. Radmanovic might be a better player in the right system, but he doesn't have a role in the triangle and doesn't defend well. I suspect Mitch Kupchak will be making lots of phone calls in the offseason to see if there's any market for Radmanovic. I imagine he'll also try to shop Luke Walton, who had an awful NBA Finals, but he's signed through 2013 (at roughly $5 million a year), and it's hard to imagine any team wanting an unathletic passing specialist.</p>

<p>--The Lakers have four free agents on their squad, the two main ones being Ronny Turiaf and Sasha Vujacic. I don't think too many Laker fans are losing sleep over free agents DJ Mbenga and Coby Karl. Turiaf is an unrestricted free agent and Vujacic is restricted. I'm sure the Lakers would like to bring both of them back. Turiaf has provided a spark off the bench throughout his Laker career and Vujacic's perimeter shooting can come in handy. I'd be surprised if Turiaf stayed though. NBA teams are famous for overpaying big men, and it's hard to see the Lakers going out of their way to outbid anyone for his services. He didn't do much in the Finals when the Lakers sorely needed his physical presence. </p>

<p>Vujaicic is a bit more likely to stay. His game seems to be improving, but it would likely take a contract similar to Luke Walton's to keep him. While he had 20 points in Game 3, he will also be remembered for letting Ray Allen blow by him late in Game 4, and he's had plenty of horrible shooting games. This is a tough call that Kupchak will have to make. It's possible that he'll think there are other available players who can do what Vujacic does. </p>

<p>Chris Mihm and Trevor Ariza also have player options. My guess is that Ariza will elect to stay with the Lakers at $2.9 million. He will likely play a greater role next season as a defensive specialist, and would then command a greater salary in 2009-10. He's also an LA guy and probably wants to stay. I don't know what his agent is thinking though. I think it's very possible that Mihm will opt out of his contract, given his less than minimal role in the playoffs. Although Mihm, could elect to stay for $2.5 million and be loyal to the Lakers after rehabbing him through a seemingly endless series of injuries.</p>

<p>--Many Laker fans think the team will be unstoppable when Andrew Bynum returns from injury next season. But I'm not so sure. Bynum delayed his knee surgery because of the unsuccessful effort to bring him back in time for the playoffs. Now there's questions as to whether or not his rehab will be completed in time for training camp. It's entirely possible that Bynum will come into the season very slowly. And when he does, one has to be concerned about a player who has had serious injury problems throughout his career since high school. That being said, if Bynum is healthy, and if he plays like he did early in the season, then Lakers are the team to beat in the NBA.</p>

<p>--Two people who need to look at themselves in the mirror are Phil Jackson and Kobe Bryant. Jackson needs to ask himself why, after winning his first nine NBA finals, he's been out-coached by Larry Brown and Doc Rivers in his last two. Are there adjustments that he needs to make to his coaching style? </p>

<p>As for Bryant, he elevated his game to a new level this season. He learned how to be a facilitator and use his talents to make his team better. However, Bryant has to wonder why he wasn't able to drive to the basket at all in these NBA Finals, and why he wasn't more effective against the Celtics help defense. He needs to ask himself what he can do to get better and take his team over the final hump.</p>

<p>--Pau Gasol needs to hire a personal trainer this offseason and spend some serious time in the weight room. Gasol moves extremely well in the lane, but he was out-muscled by the Celtics all series. As mentioned before, he can't count on Bynum pulling down all of the rebounds next season. They're going to need Gasol to play strong in the post in certain matchups.</p>

<p>--Next season, the New Orleans Hornets will be favored by a number of people to win the Western Conference. The Celtics will also be in position to repeat. Additionally, I expect the Spurs to stay in the mix, the Rockets to be better in Rick Adelman's system with a healthy Yao Ming, the Jazz to continue to be a force, and you can never forget about the Mavericks, Warriors, and Nuggets in what will be a brutally tough Western Conference. And don't forget the Portland Trail Blazers, who have Greg Oden joining a promising young team that includes Brandon Roy and LaMarcus Aldridge. It's not going to be an easy road back to the Finals at all. But the Lakers certainly have the ability to get back there if Bynum is healthy and if they make the right move with Odom in the offseason.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Back to Boston</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.laobserved.com/sports/2008/06/back_to_boston.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.laobserved.com/scgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=7/entry_id=14228" title="Back to Boston" />
    <id>tag:www.laobserved.com,2008:/sports//7.14228</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-16T05:11:08Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-16T05:37:11Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The Lakers take advantage of Kendrick Perkins&apos; injury and show hustle to force Game 6. </summary>
    <author>
        <name>Phil Wallace</name>
        <uri>http://www.laobserved.com/contributors.php#wallace</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Los Angeles" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.laobserved.com/sports/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The Lakers played their best game of the series thus far, and <a href="http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/boxscore;_ylt=AhKvX7ebFHxCgaCupXLTOyE5nYcB?gid=2008061513">hung on to defeat the Celtics 103-98</a>. The series now moves back to Boston for the duration with the Celtics up 3-2. Despite the win, one doesn't get the sense that the Lakers have had an outstanding 48-minute effort yet in the Finals. The team has had severe defensive lapses, and made multiple inexcusable mistakes. </p>

<p>It almost seems remarkable that the Lakers managed to win this game in spite of themselves. They had a 19-point lead in the first half and 14-point lead in the 4th quarter, yet the game still felt like a nail-biter. Fortunately, for the Lakers, Kendrick Perkins' injury and Kevin Garnett's foul trouble left the Celtics soft in the middle. It seemed like Kobe Bryant recognized that, and deferred regularly in the second half to Pau Gasol (19 points, 13 rebounds) and Lamar Odom (20 points, 11 rebounds). It's not that either player was dominating, but the combination of the two made the difference in tonight's game.</p>

<p>I'm watching the Phil Jackson press conference as I write this, and he just said that the Lakers played hard throughout, but not smart at times. That's a pretty apt way of putting it. If the Lakers have any hope of winning in Boston, then they need to make smarter decisions. They also need to figure out how to guard Paul Pierce, who played all 48 minutes. Pierce has easily been the best player in this series, and with the exception of Game 3, the Lakers have had no answer for him defensively. </p>

<p>Still, the Lakers live to fight another day, and if they find a way to steal Game 6, then anything can happen in a Game 7. </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>LA Football Update</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.laobserved.com/sports/2008/06/la_football_update.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.laobserved.com/scgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=7/entry_id=14217" title="LA Football Update" />
    <id>tag:www.laobserved.com,2008:/sports//7.14217</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-13T19:41:18Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-13T20:10:50Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The NFL calls Ed Roski&apos;s stadium proposal &quot;an interesting possibility.&quot; </summary>
    <author>
        <name>Phil Wallace</name>
        <uri>http://www.laobserved.com/contributors.php#wallace</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Los Angeles" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.laobserved.com/sports/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The NFL met with Majestic Realty regarding Ed Roski's stadium proposal in the City of Industry, and it <a href="http://www.sgvtribune.com/business/ci_9565139">appears to have gone well</a>. </p>

<p>"At their request, the Roski group provided us an update on their stadium project," wrote NFL spokesman Brian McCarthy in an email to the San Gabriel Valley Tribune. "Mr. Roski's site certainly seems to present an interesting possibility. The permitting and construction processes seem to be more defined than other sites we have seen." </p>

<p>I'm not sure if the NFL ever used the words "interesting possibility" to describe the Coliseum site, so this is a good step. </p>

<p>I might be wrong, but at this point I see the biggest hurdle to an NFL return being a team's intentions to actually move here. In order for that to happen, a number of stars need to be aligned at the same time. Mike Florio of the well-respected ProFootballTalk.com has an article on the Sporting News web site, <a href="http://www.sportingnews.com/yourturn/viewtopic.php?t=422305">outlining 10 scenarios in which the NFL could return to LA</a>, with eight teams cited as relocation candidates. At the top of his list is the Jacksonville Jaguars, who we've mentioned several times before. Los Angeles Jaguars kind of has a nice ring to it, doesn't it? Right now the Jaguars are playing in a tiny market and struggling to sell out their stadium.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Painful Loss</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.laobserved.com/sports/2008/06/painful_loss.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.laobserved.com/scgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=7/entry_id=14210" title="Painful Loss" />
    <id>tag:www.laobserved.com,2008:/sports//7.14210</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-13T05:44:38Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-13T06:07:34Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The Lakers blow an opportunity to tie the series, and suffer one of the worst losses in team history. </summary>
    <author>
        <name>Phil Wallace</name>
        <uri>http://www.laobserved.com/contributors.php#wallace</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Los Angeles" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.laobserved.com/sports/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'm almost too upset to write anything after the <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/recap?gameId=280612013">Lakers stunning Game 4 loss</a> to the Celtics. This is probably the third-worst loss in Laker history, only after the team's heartbreaking Game 7 loss to Boston in the 1969 NBA Finals, and the Game 4 loss to the Celtics in 1984. </p>

<p>The Lakers did exactly what the Celtics did in the fourth quarter of Game 2. They got far too complacent with a big lead, and when the game got close, the Celtics played terrific defense and the Lakers played a paranoid schizophrenic offense. Paul Pierce did a remarkable job on Kobe Bryant, and Lamar Odom was a completely different player in the second half after a stellar first half. </p>

<p>People like to say that Game 5 is the most important game in a series, but I think it's Game 4. That's the game which determines whether a series is close or whether one team will be in the driver's seat down the stretch. Well, the Celtics have clear control of this series, and I have no idea how the Lakers will recover. The motivation on Sunday night is to prevent the Celtics from celebrating on the Lakers home floor. I can realistically see the Lakers stealing back Game 5. But they need a million things to break right in order to win two in Boston. </p>

<p>One other note... there's an excellent take on the Tim Donaghy allegations <a href="http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-heisler12-2008jun12,0,3922843.column">from Mark Heisler today in the LA Times</a>, the nation's best basketball writer. </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Lakers Take Game 3</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.laobserved.com/sports/2008/06/lakers_take_game_3.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.laobserved.com/scgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=7/entry_id=14185" title="Lakers Take Game 3" />
    <id>tag:www.laobserved.com,2008:/sports//7.14185</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-11T06:44:41Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-11T07:00:39Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The Lakers win an ugly defensive affair to get back in the series. </summary>
    <author>
        <name>Phil Wallace</name>
        <uri>http://www.laobserved.com/contributors.php#wallace</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Los Angeles" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.laobserved.com/sports/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The Lakers <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/boxscore?gameId=280610013">won an ugly 87-81 victory over the Celtics</a> tonight to cut Boston's lead to 2-1. Here are some observations:</p>

<p>--While the Lakers won, the Celtics are still controlling the tempo of this series, and that's very worrisome. Today was a low-scoring physical defensive affair that is in direct contrast to the Lakers preferred up-tempo style. </p>

<p>--Sasha Vujacic saved the Lakers today. Kobe Bryant is going to get his points. But with Lamar Odom continuing to be ineffective on offense, and Pau Gasol missing everything possible, the Lakers had to get offense from somewhere. Vujacic's 20 points was like a godsend. But if I'm LA, I can't keep counting on that. Gasol and Odom need to step up. </p>

<p>--Paul Pierce finally had a bad game. He had been the best player in the first two games, but the Lakers were able to force him to take bad shots, and he fell back to six points on a putrid 2-for-14 shooting. </p>

<p>--While the Celtics only out-rebounded the Lakers 45-44 tonight, it seems like Boston is getting all of the key rebounds, especially on the offensive end. Ronny Turiaf played 19 minutes and grabbed zero rebounds. That has to change.</p>

<p>--48 hours after he played the game of his life, Leon Powe played only six minutes. I have no idea what Doc Rivers was thinking there. Powe clearly causes matchup problems for the Lakers, so Rivers helped LA out by not playing him. </p>

<p>--Does Vladimir Radmanovic do anything? </p>

<p>--The Lakers need to come out and push the pace in Game 4 on Thursday. They also need to get much better ball movement and execute the triangle. It's not easy against this Celtic defense, but that's why it's called the NBA Finals. <br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Kings Fire Crawford</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.laobserved.com/sports/2008/06/kings_fire_crawford.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.laobserved.com/scgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=7/entry_id=14176" title="Kings Fire Crawford" />
    <id>tag:www.laobserved.com,2008:/sports//7.14176</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-10T23:37:56Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-10T23:58:17Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The Kings are looking for a new head coach just 10 days before the NHL Draft. </summary>
    <author>
        <name>Phil Wallace</name>
        <uri>http://www.laobserved.com/contributors.php#wallace</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Los Angeles" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.laobserved.com/sports/">
        <![CDATA[<p>In a bizarrely-timed move, the Los Angeles Kings <a href="http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-kings11-2008jun11,0,7166217.story">fired head coach Marc Crawford</a> today. While the Kings have been lousy in Crawford's two years, the timing of this move comes as a big surprise. The Kings season ended in April, the NHL Draft is just a week away, and Kings President and GM Dean Lombardi has repeatedly said over the past few weeks that Crawford's job was safe. The timing of the move also prevents the Kings from looking at some potentially qualified coaches, such as the technologically-savvy Ron Wilson, who just signed with the Toronto Maple Leafs. </p>

<p>Crawford seemed like a good hire two years ago. He had won a Stanley Cup with the Colorado Avalanche, and he coached several winning teams with the Vancouver Canucks. However, his style did appear clash at times with the young and developing Kings squad, and he had the two worst seasons of his career. Still, it appeared that the Kings were going to give Crawford another shot, as they continue to build. Then came today's decision.</p>

<p>I'm not sure why the move was made now, but regardless, the Kings need someone who can elevate the games of young guys like Anze Kopitar to the next level. They also need someone who can work extremely well with Lombardi, and who won't mind having little or no input on the No. 2 overall selection in next week's draft.  </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Lakers Fall Short in Game 2</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.laobserved.com/sports/2008/06/lakers_fall_short_in_game_2.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.laobserved.com/scgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=7/entry_id=14147" title="Lakers Fall Short in Game 2" />
    <id>tag:www.laobserved.com,2008:/sports//7.14147</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-09T04:36:33Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-09T05:45:18Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The Lakers look unimpressive in Game 2, as their comeback attempt falls short. Now the series shifts back to LA. </summary>
    <author>
        <name>Phil Wallace</name>
        <uri>http://www.laobserved.com/contributors.php#wallace</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Los Angeles" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.laobserved.com/sports/">
        <![CDATA[<p>It seemed like the Lakers were left for dead in the fourth quarter, trailing by 24 with just over 7 minutes left. But Kobe and the Lakers would come back to within 2, before finally <a href="http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/boxscore;_ylt=AoZFADZ3erBQlAgvsLB8TKE5nYcB?gid=2008060802&prov=ap">losing 108-102 at the TD Banknorth Garden</a>. Here are some observations from Game 2:</p>

<p>--Let's be honest. The Lakers only came back to make it interesting because the Celtics fell asleep. There was a premature celebration on the Parquet Floor, but the Celtics forgot that Kobe Bryant is one player who will never give up on a game. Still, the Lakers dug themselves too deep of a hole, and couldn't surpass Boston in the end. I do think the Lakers comeback gives them some confidence though heading back to Los Angeles. </p>

<p>--Where was the Laker defense? If Paul Pierce gets another wide open three pointer, I'm going to throw up. Yes, Pierce is a special player, and he's been the star on the floor for Boston in this series. But it's not that hard for an NBA player to go 4-4 from three-point range when absolutely no one is within 20 feet of him. Pierce's open looks weren't the only problems though. The Lakers became exceptionally lax in transition defense, they allowed Leon Powe to attack the basket, and they just didn't play great team defense in terms of providing help and adjusting to the shooter. </p>

<p>--With all of the NBA head coaching jobs available this offseason, I'm surprised more teams didn't take a serious look at Tom Thibodeau. As the Celtics unofficial defensive coordinator, Thibodeau has drawn up the game plan that's stifled the Lakers' triangle. If the Lakers want to get back in this series, they need to get better spacing and improve their ball movement. Right now, it just doesn't seem like they're rotating properly on offense. Kobe Bryant needs to become more of a facilitator, but he needs his teammates to get open as well. </p>

<p>--The Lakers need to push the tempo more when their bench is in the game. Jordan Farmar, Luke Walton, and Ronny Turiaf look bewildered on the court together. In the regular season, it was the Laker bench that provided a spark, ran the floor, and scored points in transition. In this series, it was the Laker bench that got bulldozed and allowed the Celtics to extend their lead. </p>

<p>--Leon Powe is an excellent player. Many Pac-10 basketball observers have known this for some time, and I always felt that Powe would be a very good NBA player after watching him play at Cal. I broadcast one of his games his college, and you could tell that he had the size and physical strength to play at the next level. However, knee surgery in college set Powe back, and he fell to the second round in the 2006 NBA Draft. Tonight, the Leon Powe who scored 21 points, was the player that many people thought he'd become years ago. </p>

<p>--Leon Powe attempted more free throws than the entire Lakers team. I never like to blame the referees, and the Lakers didn't lose because of them. But the officiating was certainly unbalanced. The Lakers had a few too many calls go against them, and at the end of the game, we see that the Celtics attempted 38 free throws versus 10 for the Lakers. Generally, referees favor the home team with calls in playoff games, but tonight was a little ridiculous. </p>

<p>--The Celtics were 64.3% from beyond the arc. Sure they have some great shooters, but again, the Lakers just aren't even guarding them. </p>

<p>--Again, Lamar Odom got in foul trouble and wasn't much of a factor. </p>

<p>--When did Jeff Van Gundy get so candid on the air? He's suddenly become one of the best color commentators in sports television. His quick wit and friendly sparring with Mike Breen and Mark Jackson make these broadcasts far more enjoyable to listen to. When the Lakers were getting blown out early in the fourth quarter, about the only thing that brought a smile to my face was Van Gundy's discussion of <a href="http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/features/2008_swimsuit/models/bar-refaeli/">Leonardo DiCarpio's girlfriend</a> and his apology to Julius Erving after Jackson dared to compare Leon Powe to Dr. J.</p>

<p>--If the NBA wants to build their game with younger fans, then they have to start these games earlier. We don't notice it here on the West Coast. But the game started well after 9 PM Eastern Time, and didn't end until close to midnight Eastern Time because of the usually high number of commercials in NBA Finals games. The start times are more understandable for weeknight games because us west coasters are usually racing home from work to catch the action. But on a Sunday, there's really no reason to make it such a late night for east coasters. If the game had started two hours earlier tonight, then I really believe that the difference in ratings would have been negligible. </p>

<p>--This series isn't over just yet. The Lakers obviously play better at home, and there is precedent for a team coming back from down 2-0 in the NBA Finals. However, right now, the Celtics sure look like the better team. </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Celtics Take Game 1</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.laobserved.com/sports/2008/06/celtics_take_game_1.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.laobserved.com/scgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=7/entry_id=14125" title="Celtics Take Game 1" />
    <id>tag:www.laobserved.com,2008:/sports//7.14125</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-06T04:55:11Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-07T01:50:34Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Paul Pierce and the Boston defense make the difference in Celtics&apos; game 1 win over the Lakers. On to Game 2. </summary>
    <author>
        <name>Phil Wallace</name>
        <uri>http://www.laobserved.com/contributors.php#wallace</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Los Angeles" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.laobserved.com/sports/">
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>***UPDATE --</strong> I will be hosting a sports talk radio show on KSCR 1560 and KSCR.org on Saturday from noon to 2 PM. I will host the show every Saturday throughout the summer. This week, the NBA Finals will be the main topic of conversation.*** </p>

<p>The Boston Celtics showed this is going to be a tight series, <a href="http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/boxscore;_ylt=Aok73x.X_3cUMdNuv8p9jYE5nYcB?gid=2008060502">winning Game 1 of the NBA Finals 98-88</a> over the Lakers. Here are a few observations for the game:</p>

<p>--These two teams are more evenly matched than I realized. Both teams' "Big 3" are equally formidable and they match up well against each other. </p>

<p>--The Celtics are a fantastic defensive team. We knew this going in, as Boston was rated as the best defensive team in the NBA. But I guess we discounted this fact too much, perhaps because they played in the East. With the exception of a few well-executed pick-and-rolls in the middle of the game, the Lakers never seemed to get into an offensive rhythm. LA's 88 points was its second-lowest in the playoffs this year, and a far cry from the 110+ point games that we saw against Denver and Utah. </p>

<p>--Boston completely took Kobe Bryant out of the game. I don't think Bryant was a selfish player at all. He had six assists and seemed to be trying to work his teammates in regularly. But he shot 9-for-26 from the field, and it seemed like he was constantly double-teamed and forced into taking horrible shots with few passing lanes in his sights. He never seemed to be able to penetrate the Celtics defense and get into the lane. Bryant only scored four points in the fourth quarter, when he was needed the most.  I expect him to come out and get revenge in Game 2. Kobe isn't the type of player who can stand getting beat. </p>

<p>--Paul Pierce's return from his 3rd quarter sprained knee was the clear turning point in the game. The Lakers were unable to hit a few shots when Pierce was briefly in the locker room, and when Pierce returned, the momentum had clearly shifted to the home team. His two quick three pointers punctuated the change in tone. The Lakers shot 5-for-20 in the fourth quarter, and it just seemed as though every bounce when the Celtics way. </p>

<p>--Derek Fisher is a fantastic finals player. But if he's the Lakers No. 2 offensive option, then the team is in trouble. Lamar Odom got into foul trouble and didn't have the impact that the Lakers needed from him. Pau Gasol did play well, scoring 15 points and grabbing 8 rebounds, but the Lakers needed more out of him down the stretch. Gasol missed some key shots in the fourth quarter, and while some seemingly just went in and out, the Lakers needed those to go in. </p>

<p>--The Celtics bench outplayed the Lakers bench. PJ Brown got some substantial minutes off the bench and had some rebounds that reminded one of the PJ Brown from ten years ago. Sam Cassell was a nuisance for the Lakers offensively, although he did commit his own share of mistakes. James Posey did a very good job away from the ball and covering Bryant at times. Leon Powe was also somewhat effective on the boards. As for the Lakers, Jordan Farmar didn't do much. Luke Walton never seemed comfortable with the ball and I certainly didn't feel confident when he was involved in any play. And while he wasn't a bench player, Vladimir Radmanovic reverted to the absentee player that he's been known to be sometimes. Trevor Ariza didn't play at all, raising doubts about his health, fitness, and conditioning in this series. </p>

<p>--The Celtics out-rebounded the Lakers 46-33. The Lakers need to get tougher on the boards. </p>

<p>--Laker fans shouldn't be too discouraged. They've lost Game 1 of the NBA Finals before, and won the series. Remember they lost to the Sixers in Game 1 of the 2001 NBA Finals. They also lost to the Celtics in Game 1 of the 1985 NBA Finals. And heck, remember that the Miami Heat dropped both games 1 and 2 in Dallas in the 2006 NBA Finals, and went onto win the series. Phil Jackson can make the appropriate adjustments to the triangle for the Lakers to improve offensively in Game 2. Kobe will find ways to get through the Boston defense, and I expect Lamar Odom to be more of a force with the ball. This is going to be a knock-down drag-'em out series. It's going to be fun. Game 2 is Sunday night. </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed> 

