Broad's plan for Grand Avenue

Author D.J. Waldie writes on today's LAT op-ed page that Angelenos have left big decisions about the community to builders such as Eli Broad, and so the latest scheme to elevate Grand Avenue with residential towers, retail and public gathering spaces reflects him.

The retail component sounds, unfortunately, like a typical suburban "lifestyle center" with the movie theaters and bookstores that are everywhere. This is probably good business, but it may be bad urban planning. I don't know.

Nor do I know if it's a good idea to have one man's vision be the pivot on which a project of this importance will turn. It's not that Broad has been anything less than public-spirited, in the way that immensely wealthy and willful men imagine they are public-spirited. When Broad makes things happen in L.A., he sees to it they happen in ways that reasonably satisfy him, which he understands, I guess, to be the common good. (The county art museum was going to be radically rebuilt. Instead, it's getting a much tamer expansion — and a new building/museum, with Broad's name on it.)

Downtown is practically a museum of redevelopment plans gone wrong, missed opportunities and even more broken promises, so we need Broad. Someone has to wield power to get anything done, after all, which is what the old Committee of 25 did half a century ago in trying to turn its scandal-plagued and honky-tonk town into a real city.

Earlier this week, city and county officials approved the Grand Avenue plan: five skyscrapers, 400,000 square feet of retail, movie theater complex, a sixteen-acre park between the Music Center and City Hall and other work. Broad says it will create a vibrant new city center, but reviews are mixed. Times architecture critic Christopher Hawthorne, for example, wrote, "If well executed, the park could give downtown the truly vibrant gathering place civic leaders have dreamed of since the City Beautiful Movement at the turn of the previous century. But if it is sterile, overly precious or devotes too much space to high-priced retail pavilions, it will reinforce the city's reputation as a place where the private and the profitable trump the public every time."

First reactions:
Will this time be different? (LAT)
Imagining downtown (LAT)
Grand plan cost jumps $600 million (Daily News)

10:29 AM Thursday, May 26 2005 • Link
More by tag: Los Angeles
Email or share:
© 2003-2008   •  About LA Observed  •  Contact the editor
LA Biz Observed
8:08 AM Wed | It's bad enough when you profit on other people's misery. But flaunting that success brings you into a whole different league.
7:59 AM Wed | Living is lots cheaper, holiday air travel expected to tumble, MOCA in financial trouble, and auto show opens amid gloomy times.
Native Intelligence
TJ Sullivan | Without referencing its recent layoff, the Ventura County Star's editor says the suburban LA paper is now "more streamlined and, in many ways, much more efficient."
Deanne Stillman | We stripped the Indians of their ponies, and now we're doing it to ourselves.
TJ Sullivan | When the sun looks like that, there's a big fire somewhere regardless of whether we see or smell smoke.
Bill Boyarsky
Lee Abrams, Tribune Company's chief innovation officer, doesn’t seem too impressed with the Los Angeles Times. That’s the feeling I got when he appeared at the Los Angeles Press Club.
Jenny Burman
Marionettes and their creator could lose home.
Here in Malibu
Jelena Jankovic is not losing any sleep.
Sponsors
Jewish Journal logo
California Wellness Foundation
Playa Vista ad
Premium Blogads

 
Books, Blogs & Events

Get RSS Feeds
of LA Observed
LA Observed publishes several Real Simple Syndication feeds for easy scanning of headlines. If you wish to subscribe to a feed, most popular RSS readers will do it for you. You can also enter the web address from the XML button below or click on a specific feed. For more help with RSS, try here or here.




Add to Google