Michael Wolff: Papers should die

Michael Wolff continues his ongoing rant about newspapers at Newser, arguing that most papers have surrendered their niche anyway and that better means of doing their job are readily available.

The idea that newspapers exist now as watchdogs talking truth to power is roll-on-the-floor funny.

Take away the top three or four papers in the country (the Times, the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal, and, occasionally, the LA Times), and what you’ve got left is a collection of mostly chain-owed papers that have systematically cut back on all aspects of coverage and pay their reporters like bank tellers. They don’t do international or national, and barely do local. The Chicago Tribune still has almost 500 people in its newsroom—and for what?

Who will do investigative journalism, is the plaintive cry, as if that’s what papers are dying to do. My friend Randall Rothenberg, who runs the Interactive Advertising Bureau, and who was a long-time reporter at the New York Times, points out that for all the praise the beleaguered Boston Globe got for its investigation of sexual abuse by Catholic priests, the better question is where was the Globe for the 40 years this abuse was going on.

Speaking of: And the trades are barely covering Cannes, Mark Lacter notices.

More by Kevin Roderick:
Standing up to Harvey Weinstein
The Media
LA Times gets a top editor with nothing but questions
LA Observed Notes: Harvey Weinstein stripped bare
LA Observed Notes: Photos of the homeless, photos that found homes
Recent Newspapers stories on LA Observed:
Read the LA Times response to Los Angeles Magazine's piece
NYT thins more in Los Angeles, and the LAT hires locally
Oops: 6-year-old Betty Broderick story runs in LA Times*
More details on mixed use plan for LA Times buildings
Tribune doubles down on the whole Tronc thing
Tribune Publishing sending its IT jobs to India
Tribune Publishing slides toward parody
Sadly for LAT, this might be worst Tribune yet


LA Observed on Twitter