Why The Economist has no bylines

| 1 Comment

Well it has a few, on special stories, but very few. In his media column in this Sunday's L.A. Times, David Shaw explores the Economist's success -- circulation is soaring in the U.S. post 9-11 -- and makes note of its unpredictable slant. While strongly for the Iraq war, its recent cover advised the Bush administration against the use of military tribunals: Unjust, Unwise, Un-American. On bylines, Economist editor Bill Emmott tells Shaw:

Journalists are egomaniacs and protective about their own territory and their own work, and not having bylines mitigates against that somewhat. With bylines, you worry more about your own story. With no bylines, you worry more about the whole paper because your reputation depends on the reputation of the whole paper.

(Link via Romenseko)

More by Kevin Roderick:
Ralph Lawler of the Clippers and the age of Aquarius
Riding the Expo Line to USC 'just magical'
Last bastion of free parking? Loyola Marymount to charge students
Matt Kemp, Dodgers and Kings start big weekend the right way
LA Times writers revisit their '92 riots observations
Recent Magazines stories on LA Observed:
Balboa Island has to decide if it believes in global warming
Q&A with Griffith Observatory curator Laura Danly
Campaign 2012: The view from over there
Los Angeles mag a finalist for two Ellies
Architecture critic Paul Goldberger jumps to Vanity Fair

New at LA Observed
Follow us on Twitter

On the Media Page
Go to Media
On the Politics Page
Go to Politics

LA Biz Observed
Arts and culture

Sign up for daily email from LA Observed

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

LA Observed on Twitter and Facebook