Variety reports that the Adult Industry Medical Health Care Foundation and Adult Video News, the industry's trade publication, have called for all porn production to shut down for two months after actor Darren James tested positive for the virus. (Actually, AVN's editors urged a shutdown or a switch to condom-only productions.) Reuters follows up with a story that the two months off would be used to test the 14 actresses who have recently had onscreen sex with James, and those women's 35 subsequent sex partners. Also, the L.A. website Pornblography (adult content) wades tentatively into the issue while covering a shoot this week involving porn star Janine Lindemulder -- her scheduled partner did not appear because he was "in quarantine" over the HIV scare. And for a marker of how far porn has crossed over into mainstream culture, today's "At Home" feature in the New York Times Home and Garden section visited demurely with porn star Jenna Jameson at her mansion in Scottsdale. The website Fleshbot also has been asking readers to send in gossip sightings of porn stars around town, and has been getting lots of response.
* Update: Adult Video News reports online that Lara Roxx, a perforrmer who worked with James, has tested positive (after only three months in the business). The trade names the actors and actresses who have worked recently with one of the infected performers, and gives a roundup of the industry's reaction, including most major producers halting filming.
** And: Brian Flemming blogs on the contrast between the regulations he had to comply with to shoot films in L.A., and the lack of rules that govern teenager Lara Roxx doing unprotected double-anal with an HIV-positive actor in front of porn cameras in the Valley.
*** Friday Update: Five reporters are credited on Friday's LAT story on the porn biz reeling. Plus a graphic tracing the pyramid of James' sexual partners possibly exposed. Daily News story.
Imagine the outrage if the other movie industry had this kind of testing and subsequent naming of names. The lack of solidarity with their brothers and sisters in celluloid is damning. Ain't they all actors?
I'm no fan of porn or the SFV industry, but I'm sure there are A-listers who'd flinch from a public blood test.
At the age of 50, I'm certainly not naive, a prude, or inexperienced, but WHAT is DOUBLE anal?????
gj
Two male appendages in one female a--.
Why am I not surprised that about the last news outlet on earth to report this story was the LA Times around 10PM Thursday.
I faxed the LAT's about several recent HIV infections in porn in the fall of 1997. In January 2003, after another half dozen infections, the LAT finally published their story.
Posted by: Luke Ford at April 16, 2004 09:40 AMThanks for covering this, Kevin. As Luke points out, the real scandal here is that industry practices weren't a scandal years ago.
Posted by: Brian Flemming at April 16, 2004 11:20 AMStrangely enough, I don't think a movie about shooting Bill Gates in the head is a good thing (see the Fleming link). Considering the Jon-Erik Hexum case I don't think having to hire state-approved pros is a bad thing. But, at the same time, the last thing I want is the gov interfering on porno sets. The porn industry has apparently started AIM in response to the Marc Wallace incident; I'd suggest letting them police themselves. The alternative is likely to result in a state screwing.
Fleming also says Darren James got infected in Brazil. I read on a blog somewhere that native Brazilian tapes featuring just Brazilians usually use condoms, especially when shemales are concerned. Those observations have not been confirmed by this blogger. However, perhaps they know something that Americans visiting Brazil don't.
Posted by: The Lonewacko Blog at April 16, 2004 11:53 AMMy owner is about to vomit as she reads this, but this is one reason why we cats are superior than humans: we don't have to worry about p--n and whatnot. We only get in heat once or twice a year, do the pooky, and thats it. Cats don't masturbate, think about sex, or anything. Why don't humans give up their entertainment for the easy life--watching birds and dreaming of the ol' days? Its Man's own fault that he has to film intricate sexual scenes to please some middleaged impotent ol' f***s while he gains weight, infects his fellow man and makes a mess of it all. Who made you dastardly humans this way? Your G-D? Really, you guys. If I were a human, I'd pray to die soon and reincarnate into a cat. Live the easy life!
Posted by: Kotoka at April 16, 2004 12:23 PMKotoka's owner ought not to read these stories lest her blogging privileges be rescinded...
On the other hand, I guess this is one cat that's out of the bag. Please, Kotoka, tell your owner to at least refrain from entertaining everyone at Sunday school camp this weekend about this topic.
Posted by: Cathy Seipp at April 16, 2004 12:35 PMDear Kotoka ~
Speak for yourself -- rub, rub. Come up and see me some time, and definitely don't let your owner speak for you anymore.
Love,
Sirius (17 year old hunter loverboy)
It still blows my mind that you cannot legally engage the services of a prostitute, but you can pay individuals to have sex with each other and document that encounter. Who writes these laws? Porn producers?
Posted by: horslips at April 16, 2004 07:22 PMI wonder about the same, hors (as well as wondering about people who post in the voice of their cat). It's much more ethical -- in fact, it's highly ethical -- to pay for sex rather than fooling somebody into thinking they're going to get commitment out of it. My view on prostitution: "It's your body, sell it if you want to."
Posted by: Amy Alkon at April 17, 2004 08:32 AMWho writes these laws? Porn producers?
Entertaining, interesting angle. If you're interested, the decriminalization of prostitution and prostitutes' rights continue to be high profile issues (the infamous Margo St. James) in San Franciso, with branch offices in Los Angeles. (Paste the link to Bayswan/COYOTE, html links don't seem to be working in the comments.)
http://www.bayswan.org/COYOTE.html
Posted by: Stephanie at April 17, 2004 11:43 AMThe agony of an HIV infection notwithstanding, i find the tone of the "pornblography" site to be so telling.
first, these people and their detachment from the reality of the porn business is nothing short of incredible. i'd use the term "narcissistic" but i don't think it quite describes the true level of self-absorbtion.
when i worked at a large dot-com contemplating the integration of streaming adult content into a mainstream presentation, we met with numerous high-profile producers and content library owners. for the most part, they fell into 2 groups: old-style, middle-aged Times Square-era sextoy retailers (actually pretty nice folks, considering the stuff they surrounded themselves with) and the adult children of what appeared to be mob types -- put into business or catapulted into it by family connections, drivers of expensive cars, tooters of meaningful chemicals, etc.
it was a world that, i finally realized, had no place in my life, despite my total acceptance of its legality and mainstreaming (to a degree).
it's ironic that one of the largest revenue producers for our community is the creation of adult content, despite the fact that most of the very same creators seem to have very little to do with LA culture and lifestyle whatsoever.
and maybe that's just as well.
Posted by: Jim in LA at April 17, 2004 08:42 PM[comment expunged, in hopes the poster will go away mad...or just go away]
Posted by: jon at April 18, 2004 04:11 PMSounds to me like you doth protesteth too much, Jon.
Posted by: Mr. Ricey at April 18, 2004 09:42 PMHey, Jon, those scenes sound pretty HOT! Thanks for the links!
Posted by: mark at April 19, 2004 01:54 PMhiv can incubate for 10 yrs or more, if no cure is found, full blown aids, it is the bugs nature evolution
all quarantined adult performer are doomed!
i as a human research biologist doctor, will try to work a little faster, but money talk, bs walk, as they say in the industry!!!!
be smart play safe!!!!
tony barbosa
Posted by: tony barbosa at May 1, 2004 01:37 PM

Scare quotes need to be placed around ALL of these names, because as everyone knows or should know, performers' names are not their birth names.
Posted by: Paul at April 16, 2004 12:25 AM