First reactions to Ulin

David L. Ulin's choice as Book Editor of the L.A. Times is starting to get good blog reviews. Mark Sarvas at The Elegant Variation wishes him the best, writing: "We approve. We like David, we like his work." He also offers Ulin ten ways to improve the LAT Book Review. Tod Goldberg posts:

"This isn't an all together surprising choice, but I believe it to be the right one. Ulin is a strong writer, a keen reviewer and, for lack of a better term, seem[s] to get it, whatever it might be. And on a personal level, whenever I've been in his acquaintance, which has occurred a number of times over the last several years, I've found him to be nice, which, well, while not on the cutting edge of personal criticism seems like a worthy enough thing from my seat at the table."

In the Times' own story today by media writer James Rainey, Ulin's bosses—Deputy Managing Editor John Montorio and Associate Editor Tim Rutten—say he will be empowered to completely make-over LAT book coverage. There's also a little reportorial dig at the ex-editor, Steve Wasserman:

"I think that the review will remain urbane and sophisticated, but we want it to be far more accessible and far more attuned to what is really hot in the book world," Montorio said. "We want to be dealing with books that people are really going to want to go out and read"....

"The fact he was asked to do the authoritative L.A. anthology by a prestigious mainstream publishing house and by California's oldest literary press tells you a little something about his reach," said Tim Rutten, associate editor of The Times' feature sections. "That's why he was such an appealing choice for this job."

Wasserman had been credited with bringing respect, and a number of top-name critics, to Book Review's pages during his nine-year tenure. But some readers inside and outside the paper complained that Book Review could be arcane or fixated on topics that appealed to a narrow readership.

One Sunday section, for instance, focused solely on writing related to the Spanish Civil War.

Ulin says in the piece that he plans to focus more on fiction and will build "on the foundation that is already there to open it up and make it as energetic and engaged as possible....I would like to have a Book Review that is fairly fluid and responsive to the culture, a review that treats books seriously but has fun treating them seriously, if that makes any sense."

Previously: Ulin is LAT Book Editor

10:52 AM Thursday, August 25 2005 • Link
More by tag: Books and authors | Los Angeles Times
Email or share:
© 2003-2008   •  About LA Observed  •  Contact the editor
LA Biz Observed
11:18 AM Wed | Banks, automakers - hell, why not pornographers? Joe "Girls Gone Wild" Francis and Larry "Hustler" Flynt are asking Congress for $5 billion.
10:11 AM Wed | Somehow the guy still manages to come off as being even more obnoxious than last we remember. He insists that he'll live forever.
Native Intelligence
Adrienne Crew | The MTA's Dorothy Peyton Gray Transportation Library and Archive jumps into Web 2.0 with enthusiasm, with Flickr photos and YouTube clips.
TJ Sullivan | Chuck Todd and his goatee
Sara Catania | An appreciation
TJ Sullivan | New signs and meters are already up in Westwood Village.
Bill Boyarsky
City Controller Laura Chick is absolutely correct when she insists on the power to examine the performance of other elected officials.
Jenny Burman
At the top of Chicken Corner's wish list for quite some time has been a bookstore -- an independent shop...
Here in Malibu
It's my one-year anniversary of joining the LA Times. Sad note -- the job lasted just 10 months.
Sponsors
Jewish Journal logo
California Wellness Foundation
Playa Vista ad
Premium Blogads

 
Books, Blogs & Events

Get RSS Feeds
of LA Observed
LA Observed publishes several Real Simple Syndication feeds for easy scanning of headlines. If you wish to subscribe to a feed, most popular RSS readers will do it for you. You can also enter the web address from the XML button below or click on a specific feed. For more help with RSS, try here or here.




Add to Google