Why journos will lose the Internet fight

Ex-LAT reporter and editor William Lobdell took some meaning from a recent perusal of the most-viewed stories at the Times and Register websites, concluding that the opinion pieces, crime briefs and celebrity fluff that attract eyeballs are valued more highly than the original work of journalists. He blogs:

For many years, I always thought that newspapers would successfully make the transition from a paper product to the Internet — though the process would be painful. I’m not so sure anymore. Here’s why. The majority of Internet readers aren’t looking for a comprehensive news report that is incredibly expensive to produce....

Both The Times and Register devote tremendous resources to provide readers with in-depth reporting from around the world. But do today’s readers care? I would argue that they would rather read commentary (the reason why the Huffington Post has been so successful) and celebrity and crime news.

Lobdell's book "Losing My Religion: How I Lost My Faith Reporting on Religion in America" will be out in February.


More by Kevin Roderick:
Ralph Lawler of the Clippers and the age of Aquarius
Riding the Expo Line to USC 'just magical'
Last bastion of free parking? Loyola Marymount to charge students
Matt Kemp, Dodgers and Kings start big weekend the right way
LA Times writers revisit their '92 riots observations
Recent Media future stories on LA Observed:
A sour prognosis on KCET's future
Advice to aspiring food writers from Amanda Hesser: don't do it
Huffington Post wins Pulitzer Prize for national reporting
Investigative reporting comes to YouTube
Register's Angels mob shows results

New at LA Observed
Follow us on Twitter

On the Media Page
Go to Media
On the Politics Page
Go to Politics

LA Biz Observed
Arts and culture

Sign up for daily email from LA Observed

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Advertisement
LA Observed on Twitter and Facebook