LAT

NYT takes a lite shot at the LAT

latentrance.jpgWhen freshly assigned New York Times' newspaper beat writer Jeremy W. Peters called more than a month ago to talk about the decline over time of the Los Angeles Times, I never was quite clear on his rationale for writing that story now. I think my quip was that it seemed more like a peg for 2008. After reading his piece in Monday's NYT, I'm still not sure why now. He talks to a few Angelenos who feel the LAT is not the paper it used to be, with this nut graf:

Here in the city that has always strived to show how a sense of sophistication lies beneath the silicone and the superficial, The Times has joined the city’s impossible freeway traffic as a unifying force of complaint.

Among the quoted are ex-editor John Carroll and former executive editor Leo Wolinsky, but neither of them say anything to back up the premise.

Photo: Ed Fuentes


More by Kevin Roderick:
Standing up to Harvey Weinstein
The Media
LA Times gets a top editor with nothing but questions
LA Observed Notes: Harvey Weinstein stripped bare
LA Observed Notes: Photos of the homeless, photos that found homes
Recent LAT stories on LA Observed:
LA Times gets a top editor with nothing but questions
LA Observed Notes: Harvey Weinstein stripped bare
Why the LA Times' new theater column needs a new name
Helping in Houston, new lion cubs, Garcetti's back
Memo: New LA Times publisher drops web widget
Warren Olney leaving KCRW's radio lineup
LA Times purge 'capped a month of newsroom turmoil'
As the L.A. Times turns ...


 

LA Observed on Twitter