LAT

NYT takes a lite shot at the LAT

latentrance.jpgWhen freshly assigned New York Times' newspaper beat writer Jeremy W. Peters called more than a month ago to talk about the decline over time of the Los Angeles Times, I never was quite clear on his rationale for writing that story now. I think my quip was that it seemed more like a peg for 2008. After reading his piece in Monday's NYT, I'm still not sure why now. He talks to a few Angelenos who feel the LAT is not the paper it used to be, with this nut graf:

Here in the city that has always strived to show how a sense of sophistication lies beneath the silicone and the superficial, The Times has joined the city’s impossible freeway traffic as a unifying force of complaint.

Among the quoted are ex-editor John Carroll and former executive editor Leo Wolinsky, but neither of them say anything to back up the premise.

Photo: Ed Fuentes


More by Kevin Roderick:
LA Observed Notes: 60 Minutes, selling the Coliseum and more
Gil Cedillo, Nick Melvoin win LA runoffs*
LA Observed Notes: Baca goes down, LAX shuffle, media moves
LA Observed Notes: Big TV news, media moves, obits and more
LA Observed Notes: Writers on the verge, Fox, the riots and more
Recent LAT stories on LA Observed:
LA Times editor gets all serious: 'How could truth become so devalued?'
'Why Trump Lies' is next part of LA Times series
LA Times reporters show the way
LA Times staff warned not to join women's marches
Read the LA Times response to Los Angeles Magazine's piece
LA Times hires new sheriff's beat reporter
LA Times says pro-internment letters should not have run
LA Magazine says editor Davan Maharaj is what's wrong with the LA Times*


 

LA Observed on Twitter