Bill Boyarsky
Bio • Email • Archive

The electrical workers union's role in the DWP rate fight

Behind the big fight over power rates is the electrical workers union, determined to make sure it has command over the thousands of new jobs that will be created in the next decade in the solar-renewable energy industry.

The city is not going broke. There’s no need for Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa to shut down city services two days a week beginning next week. The Department of Water and Power could give the city treasury the $73.5 million it needs. But that would wreck the deal the DWP and the powerful Local 18 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers have to gain control over the burgeoning new energy industry.

Solar is going to be really big. It will be this century’s aerospace industry. Huge numbers of jobs will be created, ranging from highly technical manufacturing of solar cells and lithium batteries to less technical work of installing solar panels on the roofs of your home or business.

The industry and its jobs were central to the rate increase plan unveiled by the mayor March 15. He offered a two-part proposal. One was called the “Energy Cost Adjustment Factor.” This was a rate increase that is probably needed to pay for the coal that runs many of the city’s power plants. Coal prices are rising. The DWP needs the money to cover the increases—and to continue giving the city treasury the multi-million dollar payments it has been making for years to cover services other city departments supply the utility.

The second part was called the “Carbon Reduction Surcharge.” Never has the mayor or the DWP explained what this “surcharge” would do.

But the money probably would go to companies producing solar and renewable energies. Those companies have endorsed the mayor’s plan. They produce solar cells, energy storage devices and other materials.

The International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers has been working around the country to get jurisdiction over these new jobs. In Colorado, the union was a key player in passage of a solar panel law. In St. Paul, Minn, the local has been working with a company, iCell, and with the National Assn. of Electrical Contractors to teach workers the technology. The union efforts in L.A. are in line with what is happening elsewhere. The union wants the L.A. jobs created by the “Carbon Reduction Surcharge Fund.”

The possibilities are frightening. In Colorado, the union played a part in writing the requirements for solar power workers. This brings up the sticky question of who will be in charge of such a program in L.A. Must the Los Angeles technical workers in every solar startup be IBEW members? If they are not, will a non-union company be denied money from the “Carbon Reduction Surcharge Fund.”? And what about the handy homeowner who wants to go down to Home Depot, buy a solar kit and install it. Will the homeowner’s work be subject to a DWP inspector who is also an electrical workers union member?

These considerations aside, here’s what’s wrong with this. The depth of the recession is no time to tax homeowners and businesses to stimulate the growth of the solar industry. Wait until the recession has ended.

The city should just go for a minimum rate increase to pay the higher prices for coal and natural gas. This would give the DWP money for the city treasury.

Then, when Los Angeles residents can afford another rate increase, officials can go for an intelligent, well-planned and public effort to convert the DWP into an alternative energy utility.


More by Bill Boyarsky
London and L.A., sister cities
Behind the pro-Berman super PAC
A new generation steps up
Teamsters harbor victory may have broad impact
Rosendahl and Occupy LA

New at LA Observed
Follow us on Twitter

On the Media Page
Go to Media
On the Politics Page
Go to Politics

LA Biz Observed
Arts and culture

Sign up for daily email from LA Observed

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Advertisement
Show Bill some love