|
|
|
Submit for posting (guidelines)
Responding to Richard Fausset
Regarding the Los Angeles Times Atlanta bureau chief's email...
• Did anyone else notice that all of Richard Fausset's examples of "personality" coverage are (or very close to) two years old? And that one of them ran eight years ago? I know we're talking about specific people mentioned by Bruce Feirstein, but it's amusing that Fausset didn't cite any recent examples of this type of big-name coverage. Or is it that he couldn't think of any, which shows the kind of impact the current version of the Times is having on its own writers, let alone its readers.
Emerson Schwartzkopf
© 2003-2008 • About LA Observed • Contact the editor
| WSJ reports that Citigroup executive are looking into the possibility of selling the financial giant or auctioning off pieces.
| The NYU professor has predicted with confounding accuracy that the markets will keep going down.
| Without referencing its recent layoff, the Ventura County Star's editor says the suburban LA paper is now "more streamlined and, in many ways, much more efficient."
| We stripped the Indians of their ponies, and now we're doing it to ourselves.
| When the sun looks like that, there's a big fire somewhere regardless of whether we see or smell smoke.
Lee Abrams, Tribune Company's chief innovation officer, doesn’t seem too impressed with the Los Angeles Times. That’s the feeling I got when he appeared at the Los Angeles Press Club.
Sponsors
Premium Blogads
Books, Blogs & Events