Those two NYT editor's notes

The New York Times public editor opined today on the paper's troubled story involving Katherine Jackson and John Branca, the attorney for Michael Jackson's estate. In addition to needing two editor's notes to clarify the story, now public editor Clark Hoyt writes:

Readers complain to me constantly about anonymous sources in The Times, and I see them sometimes used in ways that seem too casual, in violation of the paper’s own high standards. Top editors say they are trying to instill vigilance. The Jackson episode shows how vital that is: one lapse can mean big trouble.

Central players in this episode include Los Angeles-based NYT reporter Solomon Moore and James Bates of Sitrick and Company, representing Branca.

Noted: Hoyt also criticizes the NYT for basing a trend story on the family effects of social media too heavily on the anecdotes of social media users with ties to the NYT.

Also: The New York Times is now selling wine to its readers.


More by Kevin Roderick:
Ralph Lawler of the Clippers and the age of Aquarius
Riding the Expo Line to USC 'just magical'
Last bastion of free parking? Loyola Marymount to charge students
Matt Kemp, Dodgers and Kings start big weekend the right way
LA Times writers revisit their '92 riots observations
Recent New York Times stories on LA Observed:
Touring the sites of famous Julius Shulman photos in LA
Correction o' the day
Only three+ mistakes in NYT gallery on 'Hollywood'
Frank Bruni, ex-NYT food critic, blogs about his gout
36 hours in Long Beach

New at LA Observed
Follow us on Twitter

On the Media Page
Go to Media
On the Politics Page
Go to Politics

LA Biz Observed
Arts and culture

Sign up for daily email from LA Observed

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Advertisement
LA Observed on Twitter and Facebook