Slowdown but no recession

UCLA's Anderson Forecast expects the declining real estate market to take a bite out of growth, but not create R-word problems for the California economy. That's because other sectors are holding up reasonably well. "Statewide home prices are unlikely to decline significantly unless there is a recession," writes economist Ryan Ratcliff. More noticeable price declines might be seen in new home sales (builders are more willing to cut prices than owners). As for jobs, the gains in leisure/hospitality (waiters, maids, etc) have been able to offset some of the real estate losses, but those are not great-paying jobs. That could be a problem.

Sounding especially glum this time out is senior economist David Shulman. Shulman's projections carry special weight because he's the guy who pointed out in 1986 that the country was overbuilt and by 1989 predicted a national real estate recession. Which is pretty much what happened. He was gloomier still about the outlook for Socal - and he was right about that too. Now, as senior economist of the Anderson Forecast, he expects a bumpy ride through the first half of 2007. Not horrible, but not great either. Specifically, he's looking at GDP growth to average 1.8 percent over the three quarters ending in June 2007. Just to give you an idea, first quarter GDP was 5.6 percent and second quarter was just under 3 percent. So we're talking slow. He also expects nationwide unemployment to reach 5.1 percent by the end of 2007 - not great, but not horrible either.

What Schulman is especially worried about is stubbornly high inflation.

The combination of sluggish growth and rising prices will have the look and feel of low level stagflation. Although the term stagflation conjures up images of the mid-1970s, when output declined and inflation rose, the current cycle will appear rather mild. Nevertheless policy makers will have a great deal of trouble dealing with it.

Ed Leamer, director of the Anderson Forecast, sounds a bit more circumspect. "Expect home prices five years from now to be about the same as they are today, though lower in real terms (inflation adjusted) by 15-20 percent. In the meantime, housing contribution to GDP will be very weak, with building and finance and real estate commissions suffering significant declines."


More by Mark Lacter:
American-US Air settlement with DOJ includes small tweak at LAX
Socal housing market going nowhere fast
Amazon keeps pushing for faster L.A. delivery
Another rugged quarter for Tribune Co. papers
How does Stanford compete with the big boys?
Those awful infographics that promise to explain and only distort
Best to low-ball today's employment report
Further fallout from airport shootings
Crazy opening for Twitter*
Should Twitter be valued at $18 billion?
Recent stories:
Siri versus Hawaiian pidgin (video)
Letter from Down Under: Welcome to the Homogenocene
One last Florida photo
Signs of Saturday: No refund
'I Am Woman,' hear them roar

New at LA Observed
On the Media Page
Go to Media

On the Politics Page
Go to Politics
Arts and culture

Sign up for daily email from LA Observed

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Advertisement
Mark Lacter
Mark Lacter created the LA Biz Observed blog in 2006. He posted until the day before his death on Nov. 13, 2013.
 
Mark Lacter, business writer and editor was 59
The multi-talented Mark Lacter
LA Observed on Twitter and Facebook