*Breakup of redevelopment agencies affirmed by State Supreme Court

Big win for Gov. Jerry Brown, who sought to shave $1.7 billion from the state budget by abolishing more than 400 redevelopment agencies. It's also a big loss for municipalities that had come to rely on the funding for a variety of projects - some good ones and a lot of questionable ones. The court ruled that effectively eliminating redevelopment was "a proper exercise of the legislative power vested in the Legislature by the state Constitution." When Brown proposed to kill the redevelopment program, there was such an outcry that legislators offered legislation that would have allowed some agencies to survive - provided that they shared their property tax revenue. But the court said that measure was invalid. The case was fast-tracked so that a decision could be reached before Brown presents his new budget. From the LAT:

Redevelopment proponents say they have created jobs and bustling neighborhoods. Critics contend they have starved schools and the state of scarce tax revenue and in some cases invested the public's money foolishly. Redevelopment agencies became fodder in the budget battle because their growth has led to their control of a larger percentage of tax revenue.

Just to remind you what a sham these projects can be, L.A.'s Community Redevelopment Agency set aside $52 million for a garage for Eli Broad's museum - a strange selection considering that redevelopment dollars are supposed to be spent to fight poverty and blight. From the LA Weekly:

All of South Los Angeles, population 550,000, where unemployment among young minorities is said to exceed 30 percent, would get just $32 million from the CRA -- $20 million less than Broad would get for his garage. More than $1 in every $10 of the nearly $1 billion in "redevelopment" money controlled by Los Angeles is to be spent in pursuit of Eli Broad's dream of glitzing up the Civic Center's Grand Avenue area (which is neither poor or blighted) with luxury condos, a luxury hotel, and his architecturally stunning museum. Watts, devastated by the recession, would get only $5.5 million from the CRA, compared to $102 million for the Grand Avenue luxury project and Broad's museum.

Two words for the CRA: Good riddance.

*Here's the decision, via Capitol Alert.

More by Mark Lacter:
American-US Air settlement with DOJ includes small tweak at LAX
Socal housing market going nowhere fast
Amazon keeps pushing for faster L.A. delivery
Another rugged quarter for Tribune Co. papers
How does Stanford compete with the big boys?
Those awful infographics that promise to explain and only distort
Best to low-ball today's employment report
Further fallout from airport shootings
Crazy opening for Twitter*
Should Twitter be valued at $18 billion?
Recent California stories:
Volcanic cinder in Owens Valley
Holiday shopping: On your marks, get set... spend!
14 California bookstores in nine days
Uproar over health care sites could be settling down
BART strike to end Tuesday in the Bay Area

New at LA Observed
On the Media Page
Go to Media

On the Politics Page
Go to Politics
Arts and culture

Sign up for daily email from LA Observed

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Mark Lacter
Mark Lacter created the LA Biz Observed blog in 2006. He posted until the day before his death on Nov. 13, 2013.
Mark Lacter, business writer and editor was 59
The multi-talented Mark Lacter
LA Observed on Twitter and Facebook