Yeah, I know it's tempting to dig into the governor's 170+ page proposal and leap to all sorts of conclusions. But budgets should never to be taken seriously at such an early stage - most especially this budget. The legislature won't begin looking at cuts for at least several months because the revenue outlook might change. Hey, the economy is in transition - in a good way - and it's possible that the state will have more money to work with than what's being projected. Given the gravity of the recommended cuts - including MediCal and CalWORKs, the state's work-for-welfare program - you can be sure lawmakers will be waiting as long as possible before pulling the trigger. The other imponderable, of course, is the politics connected to Brown's tax hike initiative. As Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg pointed out, "It's a January budget, and a ... June 15 budget, by definition, historically looks nothing like a January budget."
More by Mark Lacter:American-US Air settlement with DOJ includes small tweak at LAX
Socal housing market going nowhere fast
Amazon keeps pushing for faster L.A. delivery
Another rugged quarter for Tribune Co. papers
How does Stanford compete with the big boys?
Those awful infographics that promise to explain and only distort
Best to low-ball today's employment report
Further fallout from airport shootings
Crazy opening for Twitter*
Should Twitter be valued at $18 billion?
Recent California stories:Volcanic cinder in Owens Valley
Holiday shopping: On your marks, get set... spend!
14 California bookstores in nine days
Uproar over health care sites could be settling down
BART strike to end Tuesday in the Bay Area
Previous story: Brown's 2012-13 budget proposal
Next story: Nice jobs report - but what about California?
New at LA Observed
On the Politics Page
Go to Politics
Sign up for daily email from LA Observed