This seemed like a longshot - a coalition of community and union groups tried to get a restraining order on construction of the Walmart grocery, despite the retailer having all the necessary permits and approvals. Opponents say that the store will endanger the neighborhood's character and create financial hardships for smaller merchants. They also say that Walmart failed to provide the required public notices. They sound like thin arguments. Does anyone believe this would be happening if the name of the store were anything other than Walmart? At a hearing this morning, Judge James Chalfant said that the construction isn't causing irreparable harm to the environment (h/t KPCC). This isn't the end of it - a court hearing will be held in November on the project. For now, construction carries on.
More by Mark Lacter:
Why you can't make money making $5,000 suitsJudge turns down effort to halt Walmart construction in Chinatown
Friday morning headlines
Recovery that keeps defying expectations
Taking LAX's new international concourse for a spin
Still another guesstimate on number of pot shops in L.A.
Stocks close at 4-year high
Techies dominate Vanity Fair's hot-shot list
Amazon introduces new Kindle
Thursday morning headlines
Recent Retail stories:
Judge turns down effort to halt Walmart construction in ChinatownAmazon introduces new Kindle
Thursday morning headlines
Albertsons closing 19 Socal stores
Restaurants try variable pricing
New at LA Observed
Follow us on Twitter
On the Media Page
Go to Media
LA Biz Observed
Go to LA Biz Observed
Sign up for daily email from LA Observed

Annual issue is out this week