Bio • Email • Archive
 

For those of you who missed it, Lakers lose again

lakers4.jpgThat would be DirecTV subscribers who still can't receive Time Warner Cable's SportsNet channel because the satellite company and the cable company haven't come to terms on a distribution deal. Time Warner is leveraging its TV rights contract with fee demands that DirecTV refuses to pay. Actually, both sides have pretty good arguments: Time Warner is shelling out lots of money to carry the Lakers and wants a decent return, while DirecTV is trying to rein in programming costs. From this week's Business Update on KPCC:

Lacter: DirecTV is not only worried about what it has to pay for the Lakers, which is pricey enough, but also what it might cost to carry the Dodgers once team owners decide on a new TV deal. The CEO of DirectTV says that programming costs, especially sports programming, have gotten way out of hand. He obviously doesn't want to lose Laker fans, but he also doesn't want to alienate the rest of his customer base by raising prices.


Steve Julian: My mom, who grew up walking distance from the Coliseum and watched every Rams and Trojans game in person, now can't watch her beloved USC football games for the same reason. She can't get the PAC 12 channel. She's in her 70s, and THAT's driving her crazy. This is more than just a Lakers issue.

Lacter: That's right, the new Pac 12 Network isn't available on all cable and satellite systems. You know, the TV market has become so fragmented that live sports is one of the few reliable sources of programming. And what we're seeing in the L.A. market Steve is the growth of regional sports channels. So far, you have Fox Sports, Prime Ticket, the Time Warner SportsNet Channel, and the Pac 12 channel. That adds up to almost $10 per subscriber per month that the cable and satellite services have to pay, according to Sports Business Journal. But it does not include the upcoming TV rights deal for the Dodgers, which is certain to be huge - whether the team decides to start its own TV channel (as the Yankees did), or possibly work out a deal with Fox or Time Warner.

Julian: Do cable companies work well as content providers?

Lacter: Usually not - that's a big part of the problem. And eventually, all roads lead back to the sports franchises themselves. The Lakers not only asked for a multi-billion-dollar deal, but wound up giving exclusive rights to a single cable service - Time Warner - that then would be free to charge its competitors whatever it wanted. It was kind of asking for trouble, which is what they have with the DirecTV situation.


More by Mark Lacter:
Obama digs in on higher taxes for the wealthy
For those of you who missed it, Lakers lose again
Wednesday morning headlines
Business breakfast with 'Clean Tech Nation' author
Guy Fieri's new restaurant gets skewered in the NYT
Searching for higher rates? Don't look to California banks*
Council gives tentative approval to put sales tax hike on ballot*
L.A. home prices, sales shoot up
Tuesday morning headlines
Housing affordability takes dip in L.A., California
Recent Business Update on KPCC stories:
For those of you who missed it, Lakers lose again
L.A. voters: Are you ready for the next campaign?*
Campaign nonsense about China trade
More positive signs for California economy
So are gas prices coming down or what?

New at LA Observed
Follow us on Twitter

On the Media Page
Go to Media
On the Politics Page
Go to Politics

LA Biz Observed
Arts and culture

Sign up for daily email from LA Observed

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Advertisement
LA Observed on Twitter and Facebook