Giving opinion a bad name

In a "Guest Comment" at National Review Online, Michelle Malkin way overreaches when she likens the Charlie LeDuff L.A. River miscue (posted about earlier today) to "another ugly Jayson Blair-like scandal" for the New York Times. Uh, no. LeDuff omitted mention of a book and got no facts wrong. Blair invented fictitious people, anecdotes and entire stories -- and did it over and over and over again.

But why let the facts stand in the way of a naked NYT smear. Malkin signals her agenda when she raises LeDuff's ethnicity in her first paragraph. (Update: Instapundit appears to buy into it)

On the other hand, NRO runs a nice paean to the Wright Brothers flight from L.A. writer Rand Simberg, who blogs at Transterrestrial Musings.

One hundred years ago today, two sons of an Ohio bishop of the United Brethren Church, and sons of the American midwest at the turn of the last century, successfully landed a heavier-than-aircraft on a particular wind-blown Atlantic dune, called Kill Devil Hill, at Kitty Hawk, North Carolina.

That was their true feat — landing. Anyone can fly — just jump off a cliff or a tall building or bridge, and you'll fly for several seconds...

11:06 PM Wednesday, December 17 2003 • Link
More by tag:
Email or share:

"Giving opinion a bad name" is something that Malkin has done for a long time. To this day, I get nauseous when I think of one of her columns in the Daily News 10 years ago, when she wrote in disparaging terms about Tikkun editor Michael Lerner, annointing him Hilary's guru (because Mrs. Clinton quoted something he had written), making fun of his beaded yarmulke and implying he should go back to New York where he belonged (even though he spent half his time in Oakland).

Posted by: The Raven at December 18, 2003 08:44 AM

Malkin, author of "Invasion: How America Still Welcomes Terrorists, Criminals and Other Foreign Menaces to Our Shores," makes much of LeDuff's ethnicity and that he got into the New York Times on a "minority internship." She also published the following, the day before Jesica Santillan died last Feb. 21 of a botched heart-lung transplant at Duke: “We cannot ignore the tough public-policy questions in Jesica’s case that the sob-story writers at the New York Times prefer to paper over: When resources are as scarce as the supply of voluntarily donated organs notoriously are, why shouldn’t U.S. citizens get top priority? If Jesica recovers from the second heart-lung transplant, will any federal immigration authority have the guts to enforce the law and send her and her family home?” Which leads me to the conclusion that she is either an unapolgetic racist or is gunning for the NYT, or both.

Posted by: nancy at December 18, 2003 09:38 AM

Malkin's transplant article is here. Yes the Jessica story is tragic. But, lots of things are tragic, and sometimes we need to make difficult choices.

Is the NYT covering the people who are still waiting for organs because a citizen of another country illegally crossed our border in order to get organs that could have gone to a U.S. citizen? Read the article for all the other costs Malkin discusses, and consider the following quote from Milton Friedman: "It's just obvious that you can't have free immigration and a welfare state."

As for LeDuff, Malkin's article mentions another case which - if the naval officer is telling the truth - is a bit beyond the L.A. River piece.

Plus, since when did Cajuns become a Protected Class? Does this mean no one can diss Carville
anymore?

Posted by: Lonewacko: Oh &#*# I'm back in California at December 18, 2003 08:24 PM

I guess Jayson Blair's transgressions are bad because he did them "over and over again," while Charlie LeDuff isn't as pathetic because he's only done something like the following on fewer occasions:

"In September, author and columnist Marvin Olasky reported that LeDuff attributed fake quotes to a naval officer in San Diego to fit the reporter's antiwar agenda." (From Malkin's column)

Kevin R writes: "But why let the facts stand in the way of a naked NYT smear."

What an apologist for slob reporters and sloppy newspapers (yea, uh-huh, they really screen out biased writing)!

Jayson Blair must be snickering "s-u-u-uckers."

Posted by: Kyle at December 18, 2003 11:53 PM

Regarding Jesica and transplant medicine: tens of thousands of Americans die each year waiting for organs. Clearly, the system we have in place serves very few. That there are more "illegal" organ donors than those of similar status waiting for organs is beside the point. My belief (clearly not shared by Malkin who, though her xenophobia might lead one to believe otherwise, is not Native American) is that hoarding leads to scarcity, not plentitude. Santillan's death drew a line in the sand, and people decided where they stood; one sent an anonymous $50,000 check, another, a shit-smeared dollar bill with a note that said, "Get those people out of my country."

Posted by: nancy at December 19, 2003 09:14 AM

> My belief (clearly not shared
> by Malkin who, though her
> xenophobia might lead one to
> believe otherwise, is not Native
> American)

Malkin is (gasp!) Asian. Actually since Native Americans are theorized to have traveled to this part of the world via the Bering Strait, and have genetic traits closest to Asians, she's probably more closely related to so-called natives than Euro-Americans are.

And I love all the people who yell "xenophobe" so freely and easily, as they in the next breath conveniently tell their real estate agents to avoid looking at potential residences in, you know, "that" part of town.

Posted by: Kyle at December 19, 2003 10:26 AM

Heh heh...Nancy Rommelman is about as far away from xenophibic as it's humanly possible to be. And not just because she's probably in Portland right now, or headed there, unfortunately for those of us who live and read in LA.

Posted by: Amy Alkon at December 27, 2003 01:17 AM

And far away from xenophObic, too!

Posted by: Amy Alkon at December 27, 2003 01:18 AM

Charlie is a credit to this nutball business. He's not sucking up the smoke from bureaucrats' asses; he's trying to tell the stories of the people who are usually ignored.
My understanding is that it's our job to comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable. Charlie gets that.
We've all borrowed from other sources at one time or another. What pisses me off in particular is the scary possibility that news stories will now resemble the credits on a big-budget Hollywood feature: "The story was written by I.M. A Reporter, line edited by E.D. Itor, given extra reads by I. Juanamercedes and U. Donpaymeenuff and copyedited by M.Y. Jobsucks."

Posted by: copydeskdiva at January 23, 2004 03:32 PM
Comment posting has been turned off









Remember personal info?






© 2003-2008   •  About LA Observed  •  Contact the editor
LA Biz Observed
3:18 PM Fri | Preparation for the quasi-hurricane is as much about politics as it is about prudence.
12:53 PM Fri | Lots of luck. This is yet another example of the pitiful coverage of organized labor by local media.
Featured bloggers at LA Observed
David Rensin | Governor Bob Palin (R/Alaska) DATELINE: AN ALTERNATE UNIVERSE, August 29, 2008: Presumptive Republican presidential nominee John McCain today suprised...
Adrienne Crew | Skylight Books celebrates its expansion with a party on August 30th and a new, racy blog. Barbara DeMarco-Barrett's guide to Southern California Literary and Book Festivals appears in the September issue of Westways magazine.
Phil Wallace | Kickoff approaches for USC football; the Dodgers continue to struggle
Sponsors
Jewish Journal logo
California Wellness Foundation
Playa Vista ad
Premium Blogads

 
Books, Blogs & Events

Get RSS Feeds
of LA Observed
LA Observed publishes several Real Simple Syndication feeds for easy scanning of headlines. If you wish to subscribe to a feed, most popular RSS readers will do it for you. You can also enter the web address from the XML button below or click on a specific feed. For more help with RSS, try here or here.




Add to Google