*Why we love being home owners

Thanks to our old trusty mortgage interest rate deduction, Californians saved deducted an average of almost $19,000 from their tax bills in 2008, the highest amount of any state. The national average was a little over $12,000. The Tax Foundation, which did an analysis of IRS data, is none too pleased.

"Sound tax policy dictates that interest payments be deductible only when they are incurred to produce taxable income, such as those resulting from a small business loan. Mortgage interest on a principal residence doesn't meet this requirement, but a special exception was carved out at the inception of the income tax in 1913, and the mortgage interest deduction has become one of the largest and most sacrosanct loopholes in the tax code."

Daniel Gross had a pretty good assessment of the giveaway in Slate several years ago, well before the housing bust.

The deduction plainly causes distortions. People are willing to pay more for houses and buy bigger houses than they otherwise would because they can deduct the interest from their taxes. "When Americans invest the bulk of their life savings in housing, that's a redistribution of capital from the productive business sector," said Martin Sullivan, a contributing editor of Tax Notes. What's more, the expansion of the deduction seems occasionally to have more to do with stimulating the financial-services industry than with allowing Americans to turn their homes into assets. Consider the growth of interest-only mortgages. With the deduction, the government is effectively subsidizing your monthly payment. But you're not building any equity, you're just paying rent. It's hard to say how an interest-only loan encourages home "ownership."

Lots of the interest-only nonsense has disappeared with the housing downturn. But as Conor Dougherty notes at Real Time Economics, the deduction "remains an untouchable tax break and a third rail of American politics." Here's the breakout of the big winners:

--California $18,876
--Hawaii $16,730
--Dist. of Columbia $16,720
--Nevada $15,502
--Washington $14,262
--Maryland $14,162
--Virginia $14,094
--Arizona $13,616
--Florida $13,375
--Colorado $13,300
--New Jersey $13,215

*As several readers pointed out, I goofed in describing the $19,000 as tax savings rather than a reduction in the amount of taxable income. Big difference. The amount of savings would depend on the income bracket.


More by Mark Lacter:
American-US Air settlement with DOJ includes small tweak at LAX
Socal housing market going nowhere fast
Amazon keeps pushing for faster L.A. delivery
Another rugged quarter for Tribune Co. papers
How does Stanford compete with the big boys?
Those awful infographics that promise to explain and only distort
Best to low-ball today's employment report
Further fallout from airport shootings
Crazy opening for Twitter*
Should Twitter be valued at $18 billion?
Recent stories:
Letter from Down Under: Welcome to the Homogenocene
One last Florida photo
Signs of Saturday: No refund
'I Am Woman,' hear them roar
Bobcat crossing
Previous story: Economics of immigration

Next story: Stocks shoot up

New at LA Observed
On the Media Page
Go to Media

On the Politics Page
Go to Politics
Arts and culture

Sign up for daily email from LA Observed

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Advertisement
Mark Lacter
Mark Lacter created the LA Biz Observed blog in 2006. He posted until the day before his death on Nov. 13, 2013.
 
Mark Lacter, business writer and editor was 59
The multi-talented Mark Lacter
LA Observed on Twitter and Facebook