The changes will cap the maximum amount that a future city worker can earn towards his or her benefits and raise the retirement age for a full pension. It also eliminates pension "spiking," which is when employees pile up overtime, deferred vacation and sick time in order to increase their pensions. This is a step in the right direction, and the fact that it received a 14-0 vote suggests some sort of awareness of the city's financial troubles. (I liked Council President Herb Wesson's description of union members being around when his father died in the early 70s.) Thing is, the changes being enacted are low-hanging fruit. As budget head Miguel Santana points out, the shortfalls will be huge for years on out. That's because the changes only apply to future employees. A final vote will be taken in 30 days.
More by Mark Lacter:American-US Air settlement with DOJ includes small tweak at LAX
Socal housing market going nowhere fast
Amazon keeps pushing for faster L.A. delivery
Another rugged quarter for Tribune Co. papers
How does Stanford compete with the big boys?
Those awful infographics that promise to explain and only distort
Best to low-ball today's employment report
Further fallout from airport shootings
Crazy opening for Twitter*
Should Twitter be valued at $18 billion?
Recent City Hall stories:Garcettis are moving to Getty House in January
Council members at large (photo)
Greuel and others pitch Clinton for president (video)
Exit interview with Port of L.A.'s executive director
Garcetti on changing city hall culture
Previous story: Unions threaten lawsuit if Council enacts pension plan
Next story: Feds crack down on more marijuana dispensaries
New at LA Observed
On the Politics Page
Go to Politics
Arts and culture
Go to Arts and culture
Sign up for daily email from LA Observed