Totaling up the cost to watch sports in L.A.

timewarner2.jpgUntil a few months ago, Fox Sports and Prime Ticket were the only regional sports networks in town. But with the addition of the Time Warner channels and the Pac-12 Networks, cable and satellite operators are paying close to $10 per subscriber per month, an increase of more than 90 percent, according to an article in Sports Business Journal. It's just slightly below the amount operators pay in the NY market - and that doesn't include a new TV deal for the Dodgers (you know that won't come cheap). The costs aren't going down well, as seen by the continued impasse on distribution deals between Time Warner Cable and satellite operators DirecTV and the Dish Network. This is what happens when the numbers get out of hand.

Time Warner Cable's biggest business is as a distributor itself, where it has gained a reputation for conducting tough carriage negotiations with sports channels such as NFL Network and MSG Network. Now, Time Warner Cable is the one with high-cost sports channels, and other distributors are the ones complaining about them. DirecTV and Cox went public last month with complaints about the high cost of the Lakers channels. [Bob Wilson, the top programming executive at Cox Communications], worries that the strategies being used by Comcast and Time Warner Cable could threaten the entire pay-TV business if their business plan is used in other markets. "This has been a really good business model for a long time," Wilson said. "You intuitively have to have some understanding that as we go forward more people will be increasingly priced out of the product."


The rising cost of sports rights is one of the reasons why Cox decided to shutter its own RSNs earlier this year. Cox opted not to bid on the New Orleans Hornets or San Diego Padres rights this year in an attempt to prevent a bidding war that could cause those rights to climb too high. Fox Sports' RSNs eventually gained rights to those two teams, and Cox signed long-term carriage deals with the networks. Cox was the dominant cable operator in both of those markets. But Wilson said the cost of sports rights had been increasing so rapidly that it stopped making financial sense for Cox to keep those rights. "We didn't control the entire marketplace in those areas," Wilson said, adding that negotiations with other distributors were becoming problematic as rights fees rose. "And we feel that more bidders has the effect of driving rights fees up disproportionately. I'm not saying that's right. That's the path we chose. Others have chosen different routes."

More by Mark Lacter:
American-US Air settlement with DOJ includes small tweak at LAX
Socal housing market going nowhere fast
Amazon keeps pushing for faster L.A. delivery
Another rugged quarter for Tribune Co. papers
How does Stanford compete with the big boys?
Those awful infographics that promise to explain and only distort
Best to low-ball today's employment report
Further fallout from airport shootings
Crazy opening for Twitter*
Should Twitter be valued at $18 billion?
Recent Television stories:
Lucy Noland leaves NBC4, Chang has her surgery
ABC7 adds 8 pm news hour -- on Orange County channel
PBS SoCal drops its Orange County news show
Still smoking the cannibus at KCAL, I see
Fox 11's Julie Chang announces she has a brain tumor

New at LA Observed
On the Media Page
Go to Media

On the Politics Page
Go to Politics
Arts and culture

Sign up for daily email from LA Observed

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Mark Lacter
Mark Lacter created the LA Biz Observed blog in 2006. He posted until the day before his death on Nov. 13, 2013.
Mark Lacter, business writer and editor was 59
The multi-talented Mark Lacter
LA Observed on Twitter and Facebook