LAT picks Pete King to opine on recall


The L.A. Times has decided to throw more heft at the recall campaign, tapping the paper's former California columnist and city editor Peter H. King to write two columns a week. His first "On the Recall" today adheres to my bias that the recall is a lot closer to politics as usual than it is to New New Thing, so I like it:

Forget about transforming moments; the only real breakthrough this recall represents is a tactical one.

Listen closely and it's almost possible to hear the state's legion of political operatives slapping their foreheads in unison: Why oh why didn't we think of this before? We could have recalled Moonbeam, moan the Jerry Brown detractors. We could have recalled Pee Wee, weep the Pete Wilson haters. Maybe we wouldn't have taken them out, but we certainly could have roughed them up, tied down their money, shortened their leashes.

For a quarter of a century it has been canon in California politics that anybody with $1 million or so to invest can put anything before the voters in the form of an initiative. The recall simply has taken this truth and applied it to another of Hiram Johnson's hallowed experiments in direct democracy.

I'm glad to see the Times is putting King's pieces on the op-ed page. In the past, the paper would have run them alongside the news stories -- see Jim Ricci's writerly observations on the secession campaign last year. That effort ran out of creative gas before election day, but King should enjoy more freedom to be opinionated. I just hope he doesn't run out of ideas and keep writing anyway, as sometimes happens when the Times appoints these kinds of ad-hoc columns around a news story.

Of the staff on hand, I think King was a good choice -- he knows the state, knows politics and probably wants to speak to and for the great center that isn't sure what to think of this new phenomenon yet. It could turn into a waste of space, though, if he just keeps repeating the same cynic's line. Even I'm willing to be excited by high turnout, new ideas and other evidence it's more than a new partisan twist. That leaves one inside baseball question: how will King's columns really be that much different from what Steve Lopez does on the cover of California?

Also: Clint to Arnold: Watch What You Wish For (Carmel Pine Cone) Updated 8:23 p.m.: The Eastwood interview is by Kirstie Wilde, the ex-anchorwoman in L.A. Richard Horgan columnizes at

More by Kevin Roderick:
Standing up to Harvey Weinstein
The Media
LA Times gets a top editor with nothing but questions
LA Observed Notes: Harvey Weinstein stripped bare
LA Observed Notes: Photos of the homeless, photos that found homes
Recent LAT stories on LA Observed:
LA Times gets a top editor with nothing but questions
LA Observed Notes: Harvey Weinstein stripped bare
Why the LA Times' new theater column needs a new name
Helping in Houston, new lion cubs, Garcetti's back
Memo: New LA Times publisher drops web widget
Warren Olney leaving KCRW's radio lineup
LA Times purge 'capped a month of newsroom turmoil'
As the L.A. Times turns ...


LA Observed on Twitter