Today's second installment (of three) in the L.A. Times front-page series on 'The Wal-Mart Effect" looks at how the world's largest corporation gets suppliers around the globe to cut costs. The lead anecdote today is about a Honduran seamstress whose daily quota is up to 1,200 shirts a day -- two a minute for 10 hours -- and pressure is on to do better, while Wal-Mart pays a few cents less per garment than last year.
Sunday's opening story looked at some of the trade-offs communities make in embracing Wal-Mart -- lower prices, less pay for workers, fewer retail and manufacturing jobs. Here are the series nut grafs:
Wal-Mart gives. And Wal-Mart takes away.From a small-town five-and-dime, Wal-Mart Stores Inc. has grown over 50 years to become the world's largest corporation and a global economic force.
It posted $245 billion in sales in its most recent fiscal year nearly twice as much as General Electric Co. and almost eight times as much as Microsoft Corp. It is the nation's largest seller of toys, furniture, jewelry, dog food and scores of other consumer products. It is the largest grocer in the United States.
Wal-Mart's decisions influence wages and working conditions across a wide swath of the world economy, from the shopping centers of Las Vegas to the factories of Honduras and South Asia. Its business is so vital to developing countries that some send emissaries to the corporate headquarters in Bentonville, Ark., almost as if Wal-Mart were a sovereign nation.
The company has prospered by elevating one goal above all others: cutting prices relentlessly. U.S. economists say its tightfistedness has not only boosted its own bottom line, but also helped hold down the inflation rate for the entire country. Consumers reap the benefits every time they push a cart through Wal-Mart's checkout lines.
Yet Wal-Mart's astonishing success exacts a heavy price.
By squeezing suppliers to cut wholesale costs, the company has hastened the flight of U.S. manufacturing jobs overseas. By scouring the globe for the cheapest goods, it has driven factory jobs from one poor nation to another.
Wal-Mart's penny-pinching extends to its own 1.2 million U.S. employees, none of them unionized. By the company's own admission, a full-time worker might not be able to support a family on a Wal-Mart paycheck.
Then there are casualties like Kelly Gray. As Wal-Mart expands rapidly into groceries, it is causing upheaval in yet another corner of the economy. When a Supercenter moves into town, competitors often are wiped out, taking high-paying union jobs with them.
Tuesday's final piece will be about Wal-Mart's clash with labor here in California. There's a photo gallery at LATimes.com. Some initial reaction to the series with plenty of comments is at CalPundit here and here.
Nuke Bentonville!
Posted by: The Raven at November 24, 2003 01:31 PMI love that the Times' poster girl for victimization is a 35 year old with 5 kids. Bet she shops at Walmart. But personal choices never echo with the LAT's writers.
Posted by: Kate at November 24, 2003 01:44 PM"personal choices"
Exactly. If there's no bread, they can choose to eat cake.
Posted by: DG at November 24, 2003 02:07 PMThis is impressive journalism. One thing it clear shows is the remarkable reach of the Los Angeles Times, with original reporting from places as diverse as Las Vegas, Chicago, Honduras, Bangladesh and China.
Posted by: Tim McGarry at November 24, 2003 04:24 PMDG-- I didn't say anything about cake. But the Times has a habit of finding people to serve their "everyman" to drive home their slant on the subject. These people are almost never presented in 3-D. I would love to know how she ended up at 35 with 5 kids and a grocery clerk job, which then vanished thanks to big evil Walmart. Had she thought of climbing the management ladder, night school, or retraining? Where's the dad? The other guy, the chef turned union organizer, was presented in more detail, and was a better story, warts and all. But St. Kelly was anointed by the LATimes.
Posted by: Kate at November 24, 2003 04:38 PMKate write: >>> poster girl for victimization is a 35 year old with 5 kids
Posted by: Nicko in Bur at November 24, 2003 04:40 PMNow if only Marie Antoinette had thought of that: "Let them eat *retraining*."
Good luck to you, Kate. May your choices always be "perfect."
Posted by: Tim McGarry at November 24, 2003 05:05 PMWho's this bejuzzus fellow? Sounds like he's awfully ineffective when it comes to answering requests.
Posted by: LYT at November 24, 2003 05:22 PM"Now if only Marie Antoinette had thought of that: "Let them eat *retraining*."
That's good stuff. Thank you for a chuckle today!
Posted by: James at November 25, 2003 01:35 AMTim--my choices, while not perfect, are a lot more far-sighted than to have 5 kids and a semi-skilled job that's subject to the ill-winds of the market place. But Kelly's life is not the point. My point was that the Times didn't do much reporting on her--she just became a cardboard cut out of a victim of Walmart. The Times could have just as easily found a mother of 10 who's making $95,000 as a manager of a WalMart and sings alto in her church choir. But that person wouldn't serve the slant of the story.
Posted by: Kate at November 25, 2003 04:30 PMMy goodness, Kate, congratulations on your vast superiority, and may it keep you ever safe from the "ill-winds of the marketplace."
Posted by: Tim McGarry at November 25, 2003 05:58 PMInteresting debate.
Sorry I got here too late.
There but for fortune go you and I but not Kate.


Quite a phenomonon, and yet as a life-long Angeleno, I've never been in one and not sure if I've ever even seen one in California (I know they exist, but I spend most of my time, apparently, in parts of the state that are Wal-Mart free). There's a Sam's Club in Oxnard that's visible from the 101.
I do, however, shop at Costco in Culver City about 2x per year, to stock up on paper towels, toilet paper, etc.
Posted by: Ted at November 24, 2003 01:23 PM