SaveDisney.com has legs
After our SaveDisney.com item last week, the site pressing the agenda of Roy E. Disney was deemed culturally Irrelevant -- but that didn't stop the New York Times from doing a little story today.
12:01 AM Monday, December 15 2003
Link
More by tag:
New York Times
Email or share:
Kevin ~
Not irrelevant, apparently irrelevant -- and tongue in cheek, as always. It was somehow telling in more ways than one that there was no mention of the site in the Times or on the air for several days after your post (and before or after the site went up). (If there was a mention in the Times I missed it.) Someone needs to offer their professional web design and PR skills to these men, which also still seems sadly telling . . . .
OK, apparently irrelevant. Adverb omission was mine.
Kevin ~
Not irrelevant, apparently irrelevant -- and tongue in cheek, as always. It was somehow telling in more ways than one that there was no mention of the site in the Times or on the air for several days after your post (and before or after the site went up). (If there was a mention in the Times I missed it.) Someone needs to offer their professional web design and PR skills to these men, which also still seems sadly telling . . . .
Posted by: Relevant or Irrelevant? at December 15, 2003 04:21 PM