Michael Kinsley doesn't start until June 14 but he is introducing himself around the L.A. Times building today. He also expounds a bit on his new job as editorial page and opinion editor in a web-only interview with Newsweek's Brian Braiker (via Romenesko).
Because I was on Crossfire for six years, Bill O’Reilly says I’m a rabid left-winger. Well, I may be rabid in terms of temperament—I don’t think so—but in terms of my actual views, they are mainstream moderate liberal, or they average out that way. The one thing I would say is that an editorial is a different literary form than a column and certainly than a TV argument show. It should be more statesmanlike and it should be more calm. So in terms of style and in terms of not going out on a limb with some wacky idea—which you can always do as a columnist—you have to be a little more careful writing editorials.
[fast forward]
Are you boning up on your L.A. politics?
It is like “Chinatown.” Fascinating is a good way to put it. I’m not going to have to force myself to get interested in California. I went to Amazon and I’ve ordered all of [California historian] Kevin Starr’s books and textbooks and the Mike Davis “City of Quartz.” I’m going to do some homework.
Will spending half your time in Seattle make it difficult to win over readers or to grasp the issues?
I think you can grasp the issues of a place, even California, by being there half the time if you make an effort. And the Los Angeles Times aims to be in some ways the voice of the West, and the West is more than California. Having someone in Seattle is not a completely worthless thing. But mainly it’s a very generous indulgence to me by the management of the Los Angeles Times. I think it’s very cool and very impressive that they’ve agreed to it. They’re on a roll. It’s fun joining a hot book. I’ve never done that before.
Have you been watching Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger?
Well, that’s a great story too. They have an interesting piece about [his wife] Maria [Shriver]. It’s the piece that they run about the first lady, usually about two or three years into a presidential term. That piece ran [Thursday] in the LA Times. I’ve been waiting for that piece about Laura Bush.
In that front-page piece about Shriver's growing influence, by Peter Nicholas of the Sacramento bureau, Maria describes herself as fierce in her protection of and belief in her husband. Wonder what she'll say if the rumors are true that an LAT team has been chasing fresh leads about Arnold's past with women ever since the election -- and if the accounts check out sufficiently to put in the paper. Ace investigative reporter Gary Cohn, the lead byline on last year's controversial groping stories, has not been in print since Dec. 5, so he's busy on something.
Also seen in the Times building this week: Maria Russo, features editor at the New York Observer, formerly of the New York Times Book Review and Salon.com, where she was books editor and a writer. She is reportedly talking about a job on the features side of the paper. Meanwhile, buzz in the newsroom is trying to discern which high-level consolation jobs Miriam Pawel rejected when she got the word, supposedly just on Monday night, that she was out as assistant managing editor for state and local coverage. Gossips say that two jobs mentioned were masthead level, which has everybody guessing at who else might be moved. Pawel also reportedly may have rejected an overseas assignment, possibly in China.
>> "I went to Amazon and I’ve ordered all of [California historian] Kevin Starr’s books and textbooks and the Mike Davis “City of Quartz.” I’m going to do some homework."
Of course if they were looking for someone to focus on California issues they wouldn't have picked Kinsley, but this does not inspire confidence. I propose a contest for analogous statements. First entries:
1. "I've never done open heart surgery before, but I've ordered copies of "I Am Joe's Heart" from Reader's Digest and the entire "You and Your Body" series from Time-Life books."
2. "As the new chairman of the history department I've been spending the last month just absorbed in The History Channel. Did you know LBJ had Kennedy killed?"
Posted by: Robert Fiore at April 30, 2004 03:43 PMMike Davis? The guy who describes Southern California as a "secret Kansas" rife with tornadoes and vicious windstorms that the delinquent media fail to investigate fully The guy who's a MacArthur-winning crack-pot? The guy who made up a whole interview with Lewis McAdams in the Weekly? Oh joy.
I guess this means that we won't hear from Jill Stewart in the Times. The paper is even more doomed than it was.
Posted by: KateCoe at April 30, 2004 04:18 PMI think both Mike Davis and Jill Stewart should be approached with extreme skepticism. However, it also occurs to me that maybe both ought to be included on a reading list for someone like Kinsley, who will need to cultivate an appreciation for the diversity of opinion in and about Los Angeles.
What would you have him read, Kate?
Posted by: Tim McGarry at April 30, 2004 04:52 PMHe could do worse than by simply reading LAObserved.
Posted by: joseph at April 30, 2004 05:38 PMHe never gets credit for it, but Kinsley can be very funny (and not just sarcastic or backhandedly poignant). Lord knows the LAT needs some of that.
Posted by: Crid at April 30, 2004 10:49 PMWhat a great idea--an LA reading list. I'd start him off with Don Waldie, and then have him dip into the Lawrence Powell, MKF Fisher's book about growing up in Whittier,and let's not forget Diana Wagman, Katie Arnoldi, Ramona, The Barbarous Coast, Otto Friedrich's The City of Nets (one of his daughters lives in Santa Monica), Mark Salzman, JOan Didion--the possibilites are endless!
Or just send him a copy of David Ulin's "Writing Los Angeles".


The Newsweek interviewer asked Kinsley whether the Los Angeles Times editorial page has "a leftward bent"? Huh? He should have also asked Kinsley, do 'ya think the Pope is Catholic?
Posted by: Mills S at April 30, 2004 03:43 PM