LAT

LAT union vote tomorrow

Workers in the L.A Times press room on Olympic Boulevard downtown begin voting tomorrow whether to bring in a union. The paper, of course, has long been anti-union within its own walls and has a website urging employees not to go there. On the eve of the vote, Publisher David Hiller declined to attend today's Teamsters forum with workers at the Holiday Inn on Figueroa.

January 2, 2007

Mr. George Tedeschi
President
GCC/IBT
1900 L Street, NW
Washington, DC 20036

Dear Mr. Tedeschi:

I am in receipt of your recent letter inviting me to participate in the GCC/IBT open forum on January 3, 2007. As you are well aware, the following day employees will begin voting on whether they want to be represented by your Union.

This will be the sixth time since 1990 that the Union has attempted to represent our employees. As you know, the Union lost all those prior campaigns, either because it lost the election or because it gave up and withdrew the petition before the election was held.

Given the fact that balloting will begin less than 24 hours following this meeting, I do not believe attendance at your meeting will serve either side. The positions of the Union and Los Angeles Times have been well communicated to the pressroom employees over the past four weeks.

Sincerely,
David

Ed Padgett of the LAT Pressmens 20 Year Club blog plans to be there with camera in hand.


More by Kevin Roderick:
John Severson, 83, founder of Surfer magazine
LA Observed Notes: 60 Minutes, selling the Coliseum and more
Gil Cedillo, Nick Melvoin win LA runoffs*
LA Observed Notes: Baca goes down, LAX shuffle, media moves
LA Observed Notes: Big TV news, media moves, obits and more
Recent LAT stories on LA Observed:
LA Times editor gets all serious: 'How could truth become so devalued?'
'Why Trump Lies' is next part of LA Times series
LA Times reporters show the way
LA Times staff warned not to join women's marches
Read the LA Times response to Los Angeles Magazine's piece
LA Times hires new sheriff's beat reporter
LA Times says pro-internment letters should not have run
LA Magazine says editor Davan Maharaj is what's wrong with the LA Times*
Previous story: L.A. less literate

Next story: Los Angeles before cars


 

LA Observed on Twitter