CIT's impact on fashion

Here's a good one from California Apparel News on the impact that a bankruptcy filing by CIT Group could have on the fashion business (much of it involving small manufacturers based in L.A.). CIT is a huge lender, or factor, for the industry - more precisely, it buys receivables from apparel makers at a discount. CIT gets paid when the retailers sell the goods. Without CIT, apparel makers don't have access to the cash they need to supply the next round of goods to retailers. This is terrible timing, given that retailers are preparing for the back-to-school season and holiday shopping season.

Any disruption in CIT's business could have a far-reaching impact on the apparel business. According to some in the industry, CIT was able to leverage its market penetration to offer lower financing terms than more-conservative lenders. The repercussions for the apparel industry are far reaching, from small- and mid-sized manufacturers to specialty stores and independent sales representatives. "Anyone who is factored is going to be affected," said Ilse Metchek, president of the California Fashion Association.

[CUT]

The only companies well-positioned to weather this crisis are those well-funded companies with good cash flow and large orders with major retailers. "The core companies are doing quite well," Metchek said. "They're going so fast they need money. The top five vendors of any department store are getting all the business."

At last check CIT bondholders were left to decide whether they should pour more money into the firm or take their chances with a bankruptcy filing. Earlier this week, the government turned down a bailout request. From the WSJ:

Punctuating the stress CIT and its bondholders are under, Standard & Poor's cut the company's credit ratings several notches to CC, deep in junk territory, saying the company may run out of time to save itself. "We believe that CIT faces an extremely short timeline to raise additional liquidity," S&P said in a release. "In our view, the compressed timeline makes it very difficult for CIT to pursue other liquidity initiatives successfully, such as secured borrowings, asset sales, or debt restructuring."

More by Mark Lacter:
American-US Air settlement with DOJ includes small tweak at LAX
Socal housing market going nowhere fast
Amazon keeps pushing for faster L.A. delivery
Another rugged quarter for Tribune Co. papers
How does Stanford compete with the big boys?
Those awful infographics that promise to explain and only distort
Best to low-ball today's employment report
Further fallout from airport shootings
Crazy opening for Twitter*
Should Twitter be valued at $18 billion?
Recent stories:
Letter from Down Under: Welcome to the Homogenocene
One last Florida photo
Signs of Saturday: No refund
'I Am Woman,' hear them roar
Bobcat crossing
Previous story: Sucking up to Schwab

Next story: L.A. port traffic down

New at LA Observed
On the Media Page
Go to Media

On the Politics Page
Go to Politics
Arts and culture

Sign up for daily email from LA Observed

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Advertisement
Mark Lacter
Mark Lacter created the LA Biz Observed blog in 2006. He posted until the day before his death on Nov. 13, 2013.
 
Mark Lacter, business writer and editor was 59
The multi-talented Mark Lacter
LA Observed on Twitter and Facebook