LAT

Thumbs down on Zagat

| 4 Comments

In his food and wine columnist hat, the LAT's David Shaw has had it with the Zagat guide ratings for Los Angeles restaurants.

Zagat is enormously successful and enormously influential — a veritable bible for tourists, business travelers and local residents alike. But how can you trust "surveyors" — as Zagat calls its voters — who choose as the best restaurants in all of Greater Los Angeles some restaurants that aren't even the best in their own neighborhoods?

(edited)

My complaint is Zagat's tendency to ridiculously overrate many restaurants. This year it's worse than ever...

Shaw goes out and samples some of the restaurants rated highly in the new Zagat and comes back disappointed. In fairness, he does give Zagat L.A. editor Merrill Shindler a chance to explain how the ratings are done, and it's pretty lame. Shaw's Bottom line: use Zagat for phone numbers and addresses, but not for the rankings.


More by Kevin Roderick:
Standing up to Harvey Weinstein
The Media
LA Times gets a top editor with nothing but questions
LA Observed Notes: Harvey Weinstein stripped bare
LA Observed Notes: Photos of the homeless, photos that found homes
Recent LAT stories on LA Observed:
LA Times gets a top editor with nothing but questions
LA Observed Notes: Harvey Weinstein stripped bare
Why the LA Times' new theater column needs a new name
Helping in Houston, new lion cubs, Garcetti's back
Memo: New LA Times publisher drops web widget
Warren Olney leaving KCRW's radio lineup
LA Times purge 'capped a month of newsroom turmoil'
As the L.A. Times turns ...


 

LA Observed on Twitter