Hardcore *

Porn photos posted late at night doomed the L.A. Times wikitorial, the New York Times reports Tuesday. Deputy editorial page editor Michael Newman suggests the hardcore stuff came in after a pointer was placed on

"Slashdot has a tech-savvy audience that, to be kind, is mischievous and to be not so kind, is malicious," Mr. Newman said. "We were taking stuff down as soon as it went up and staving them off. Finally we had to go to bed. Someone called the newsroom a little bit before 4 a.m. and said there's something bad on your Web site, and so we just took the whole site down."

Here's what they're saying at Slashdot. Despite the pranking, editorial page editor Andrés Martinez told the NYT: "I was heartened by how seriously people took it. I was really impressed by the level of high-minded participation. It's not a total shock it ended up this way. Now we will evaluate what this means." Blog reactions: Jeff Jarvis, Chris Anderson at The Long Tail, Corante.

* Give Newman credit: The L.A. Times story in Tuesday's paper says Newman proposed the wiki approach. Editors expressed interest in trying again, but the pool of contributors might be more tightly controlled or their posts screened. The story by media reporter James Rainey clarifies that "nearly 1,000 users" registered to participate in the wiki — while the editor's note shutting it down still claims that "thousands of people... logged on in the right spirit."

More by Kevin Roderick:
Standing up to Harvey Weinstein
The Media
LA Times gets a top editor with nothing but questions
LA Observed Notes: Harvey Weinstein stripped bare
LA Observed Notes: Photos of the homeless, photos that found homes
Recent LAT stories on LA Observed:
LA Times gets a top editor with nothing but questions
LA Observed Notes: Harvey Weinstein stripped bare
Why the LA Times' new theater column needs a new name
Helping in Houston, new lion cubs, Garcetti's back
Memo: New LA Times publisher drops web widget
Warren Olney leaving KCRW's radio lineup
LA Times purge 'capped a month of newsroom turmoil'
As the L.A. Times turns ...
Previous story: Remember this guy?

Next story: Not so fast


LA Observed on Twitter